These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8203440)

  • 1. The Green Bay cesarean section study. III. Falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1790-9; discussion 1799-802. PubMed ID: 8203440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practice variation of vaginal birth after cesarean and the influence of risk factors at patient level: a retrospective cohort study.
    Vankan E; Schoorel EN; van Kuijk SM; Mol BJ; Nijhuis JG; Aardenburg R; Alink M; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; Dirksen CD; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kaplan M; Kleiverda G; Kuppens SM; Kwee A; Langenveld J; Lim FT; Melman S; Sikkema MJ; Smits LJ; Visser H; Woiski M; Scheepers HC; Hermens RP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):158-165. PubMed ID: 27861697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Adashek JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 9662303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Green Bay cesarean section study. I. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates.
    DeMott RK; Sandmire HF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1593-9; discussion 1599-602. PubMed ID: 2360593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Green Bay cesarean section study. IV. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for the large fetus.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 174(5):1557-64. PubMed ID: 9065129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk-adjusted measurement of primary cesarean sections: reliable assessment of the quality of obstetrical services.
    Pasternak DP; Pine M; Nolan K; French R
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10662103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
    Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.
    Stafford RS
    JAMA; 1991 Jan; 265(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1984126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    King DE; Lahiri K
    JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):524-9. PubMed ID: 8046806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Declining cesarean section rates: a continuing trend?
    Millar WJ; Nair C; Wadhera S
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(1):17-24 (Eng); 17-24 (Fre). PubMed ID: 8844177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends and patterns in cesarean section rates in Rhode Island.
    Viner-Brown SI; Cain R
    Med Health R I; 2006 Jun; 89(6):215-6. PubMed ID: 16875011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes.
    Li T; Rhoads GG; Smulian J; Demissie K; Wartenberg D; Kruse L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 12798526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study probes increase in cesarean rate.
    Kuehn BM
    JAMA; 2010 Oct; 304(15):1658. PubMed ID: 20959570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 5-year experience in a family practice residency program.
    Miller ES; Partezana J; Montgomery RL
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1995; 8(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 7484222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Factors associated with cesarean section in France. Results from the 1995 National Perinatal Survey].
    Guihard P; Blondel B
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Sep; 30(5):444-543. PubMed ID: 11598558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: a statewide program.
    Bickell NA; Zdeb MS; Applegate MS; Roohan PJ; Sui AL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 87(5 Pt 1):664-7. PubMed ID: 8677064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women in the crossfire: forced repeat cesareans.
    Jukelevics N
    Birth; 2002 Jun; 29(2):149-50. PubMed ID: 12000419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of public accountability on hospital performance: trends in rates for cesarean sections and vaginal births after cesarean section in Cleveland, Ohio.
    Caron A; Neuhauser D
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 7(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 10346457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean section rates in Italy.
    Signorelli C; Cattaruzza MS
    Am J Public Health; 1994 Aug; 84(8):1340-1. PubMed ID: 8059904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability and consistency of rates of primary and repeat cesarean sections among hospitals in two states.
    Rock SM
    Public Health Rep; 1993; 108(4):514-6. PubMed ID: 8341789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.