113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 82061)
21. Lessons from a cervical screening programme: are they transferable?
Fleischl J
Nurs Prax N Z; 1993 Jul; 8(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 8364340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Preventing cervical cancer.
Slater JS; Bar-Cohen A; Korn JE; Yawn B
Minn Med; 1994 May; 77(5):25-6. PubMed ID: 8022378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix.
Miller AB
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):149-60. PubMed ID: 3570400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of uptake of breast screening, cervical screening, and childhood immunisation.
Rudiman R; Gilbert FJ; Ritchie LD
BMJ; 1995 Jan; 310(6974):229. PubMed ID: 7866127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. High-risk groups and cervical cancer.
Br Med J; 1980 Sep; 281(6241):629-30. PubMed ID: 7437742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Mortality from cervical cancer in young women.
Hatch K
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Feb; 44(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 1544590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Letter: Screening for cervical cancer.
Lancet; 1974 Jun; 1(7868):1221. PubMed ID: 4134347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Mortality from cervical cancer: can it be prevented now?
Kessler II
Compr Ther; 1976 Sep; 2(9):38-47. PubMed ID: 963967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Harms and benefits of screening to prevent cervical cancer.
Bonneux L
Lancet; 2004 Oct 23-29; 364(9444):1483; author reply 1485-6. PubMed ID: 15500882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Fall in screening risks lives.
Burgess G
Nurs Stand; 2016 Dec; 31(16-18):31. PubMed ID: 27977354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland.
Macgregor JE; Moss SM; Parkin DM; Day NE
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6481):1543-6. PubMed ID: 3924157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improved prognosis for cervical cancers due to comprehensive screening.
Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
Acta Cytol; 1972; 16(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 4501868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Disappointing effectiveness of population screening for cervical cancer].
Giard RW; Coebergh JW; Wijnen JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Feb; 141(7):317-21. PubMed ID: 9132604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model.
Sasieni P; Adams J
BMJ; 1999 May; 318(7193):1244-5. PubMed ID: 10231253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical cancer.
Beral V; Hermon C; Muñoz N; Devesa SS
Cancer Surv; 1994; 19-20():265-85. PubMed ID: 7534630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
Day NE
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effectiveness of a cancer control programme.
Knox EG; Woodman CB
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):379-401. PubMed ID: 3242791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Screening has halved incidence of cervical cancer in UK.
Kmietowicz Z
BMJ; 2009 Feb; 338():b807. PubMed ID: 19240091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Response by Eric Suba to Sankaranarayanan et al.
Suba EJ
Indian J Med Ethics; 2014; 11(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 25101551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An epidemic averted through medical screening.
Austin H
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15814012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
