These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8207141)

  • 1. Cues for perception of the diphthong /aI/ in either noise or reverberation. Part I. Duration of the transition.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Crowley H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2681-93. PubMed ID: 8207141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vowel boundaries for steady-state and linear formant trajectories.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Crowley HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):675-87. PubMed ID: 8370873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cues for perception of synthetic and natural diphthongs in either noise or reverberation.
    Nábĕlek AK; Ovchinnikov A; Czyzewski Z; Crowley HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Mar; 99(3):1742-53. PubMed ID: 8819863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Dagenais PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 3760327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1394-401. PubMed ID: 1494281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of vowels in quiet, noise, and reverberation: relationships with age and hearing loss.
    Nábĕlek AK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 3170940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency discrimination ability and stop-consonant identification in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Ochs MT; Humes LE; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 2704188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 37(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 8028325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Letowski TR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 3990258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Phoneme Identification Test for Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Discrimination Skills in Children: Development, Normative Data, and Test-Retest Reliability Studies.
    Cameron S; Chong-White N; Mealings K; Beechey T; Dillon H; Young T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):135-150. PubMed ID: 29401061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences between children and adults in the neural encoding of voice fundamental frequency in the presence of noise and reverberation.
    Easwar V; Peng ZE; Mak V; Mikiel-Hunter J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Jul; 58(2):2547-2562. PubMed ID: 37203275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection, direction discrimination, and off-frequency interference of center-frequency modulations and glides for vowel formants.
    Lyzenga J; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3042-53. PubMed ID: 15957773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
    Nabelek AK; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of nonlinear and linear formant trajectories.
    Nábĕlek AK; Ovchinnikov A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):488-97. PubMed ID: 9000739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.