BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8207141)

  • 1. Cues for perception of the diphthong /aI/ in either noise or reverberation. Part I. Duration of the transition.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Crowley H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2681-93. PubMed ID: 8207141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vowel boundaries for steady-state and linear formant trajectories.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Crowley HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):675-87. PubMed ID: 8370873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cues for perception of synthetic and natural diphthongs in either noise or reverberation.
    Nábĕlek AK; Ovchinnikov A; Czyzewski Z; Crowley HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Mar; 99(3):1742-53. PubMed ID: 8819863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Dagenais PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 3760327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1394-401. PubMed ID: 1494281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of vowels in quiet, noise, and reverberation: relationships with age and hearing loss.
    Nábĕlek AK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 3170940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency discrimination ability and stop-consonant identification in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Ochs MT; Humes LE; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 2704188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 37(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 8028325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Letowski TR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 3990258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Phoneme Identification Test for Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Discrimination Skills in Children: Development, Normative Data, and Test-Retest Reliability Studies.
    Cameron S; Chong-White N; Mealings K; Beechey T; Dillon H; Young T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):135-150. PubMed ID: 29401061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences between children and adults in the neural encoding of voice fundamental frequency in the presence of noise and reverberation.
    Easwar V; Peng ZE; Mak V; Mikiel-Hunter J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Jul; 58(2):2547-2562. PubMed ID: 37203275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection, direction discrimination, and off-frequency interference of center-frequency modulations and glides for vowel formants.
    Lyzenga J; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3042-53. PubMed ID: 15957773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
    Nabelek AK; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of nonlinear and linear formant trajectories.
    Nábĕlek AK; Ovchinnikov A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):488-97. PubMed ID: 9000739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.