These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8207188)

  • 1. Yes, Virginia, aseptic technique is very important: maximal barrier precautions during insertion reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bacteremia.
    Maki DG
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 15(4 Pt 1):227-30. PubMed ID: 8207188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of maximal sterile barrier precautions and/or antimicrobial-coated catheters to reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection.
    Lee DH; Jung KY; Choi YH
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 29(10):947-50. PubMed ID: 18754735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations and reports about central venous catheter-related infection.
    Bacuzzi A; Cecchin A; Del Bosco A; Cantone G; Cuffari S
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2006; 7 Suppl 2():S65-7. PubMed ID: 16895510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antiseptic chamber-containing hub reduces central venous catheter-related infection: a prospective, randomized study.
    León C; Alvarez-Lerma F; Ruiz-Santana S; González V; de la Torre MV; Sierra R; León M; Rodrigo JJ
    Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1318-24. PubMed ID: 12771597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion.
    Raad II; Hohn DC; Gilbreath BJ; Suleiman N; Hill LA; Bruso PA; Marts K; Mansfield PF; Bodey GP
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 15(4 Pt 1):231-8. PubMed ID: 8207189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teaching aseptic technique for central venous access under ultrasound guidance: a randomized trial comparing didactic training alone to didactic plus simulation-based training.
    Latif RK; Bautista AF; Memon SB; Smith EA; Wang C; Wadhwa A; Carter MB; Akca O
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Mar; 114(3):626-33. PubMed ID: 22190554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contamination of guidewires during insertion of central venous catheters in an intensive care setting.
    Palmer S; Solano T
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 26(6):506-7. PubMed ID: 16018421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia.
    Moretti EW; Ofstead CL; Kristy RM; Wetzler HP
    J Hosp Infect; 2005 Oct; 61(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16026898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximal sterile barrier precautions do not reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections in general surgery units: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial.
    Ishikawa Y; Kiyama T; Haga Y; Ishikawa M; Takeuchi H; Kimura O; Harihara Y; Sunouchi K; Furuya T; Kimura M
    Ann Surg; 2010 Apr; 251(4):620-3. PubMed ID: 20224364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection prevention practices by US hospitals.
    Krein SL; Hofer TP; Kowalski CP; Olmsted RN; Kauffman CA; Forman JH; Banaszak-Holl J; Saint S
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2007 Jun; 82(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 17550746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preventing central venous catheter-related infection in a surgical intensive-care unit.
    Bijma R; Girbes AR; Kleijer DJ; Zwaveling JH
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 20(9):618-20. PubMed ID: 10501261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Universal maximal sterile barrier precautions may be unnecessary.
    Kapadia F; Rodrigues C
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1994 Nov; 15(11):685-6. PubMed ID: 7852721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cathether related blood stream infection in ICU patients with prolonged central venous catheterisation--cause and prevention].
    Karpel E; Kunsdorf-Wnuk A; Musioł E; Skorupa A; Arct-Danielak D; Jarosz U
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2006 Sep; 21(123):211-7. PubMed ID: 17163179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Central venous catheter use. Part 2: infectious complications.
    Polderman KH; Girbes AR
    Intensive Care Med; 2002 Jan; 28(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 11818995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of catheter type and site on infection incidence. Prevention techniques].
    Martin C; Eon B
    Agressologie; 1990; 31(8 Spec No):519-24. PubMed ID: 2089974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bloodstream infection: an ounce of prevention is a ton of work.
    Safdar N
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 26(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 16018424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aseptic insertion of central venous lines to reduce bacteraemia.
    Ferguson CS; D'Abrera VC; Van Gessel HJ; Jones D
    Med J Aust; 2011 Oct; 195(8):448-9. PubMed ID: 22004388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antibiotic lock technique to reduce central venous catheter-related bacteremia.
    Toltzis P
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2006 May; 25(5):449-50. PubMed ID: 16645511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hepatitis C virus transmission in hemodialysis units: importance of infection control practices and aseptic technique.
    Thompson ND; Novak RT; Datta D; Cotter S; Arduino MJ; Patel PR; Williams IT; Bialek SR
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 30(9):900-3. PubMed ID: 19642900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infection: update.
    Casey AL; Elliott TS
    Br J Nurs; 2010 Jan 28-Feb 10; 19(2):78, 80, 82 passim. PubMed ID: 20220644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.