These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8207353)

  • 1. Human choice in concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Savastano HI; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 8207353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching and maximizing with variable-time schedules.
    DeCarlo LT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Jan; 43(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 3981085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: a replication and review.
    Heyman GM; Herrnstein RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Nov; 46(3):331-51. PubMed ID: 3805975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules.
    Green L; Rachlin H; Hanson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6655424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of choice for pigeons and humans on concurrent-chains schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Powell RA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Sep; 52(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 2794844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human choice on concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules.
    Silberberg A; Thomas JR; Berendzen N
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 1774545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.
    Pliskoff SS; Shull RL; Gollub LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 5660708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delay reduction and optimal foraging: variable-ratio search in a foraging analogue.
    Williams WA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 8207354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test of the formal and modern theories of matching.
    Dallery J; Soto PL; McDowell JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 16262183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Briefly delayed reinforcement effects on variable-ratio and yoked-interval schedule performance.
    Holtyn AF; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 23900853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules in a dynamic choice environment.
    Bell MC; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Nov; 108(3):367-397. PubMed ID: 29110297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.
    Mazur JE; Vaughan W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 3681185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matching: its acquisition and generalization.
    Crowley MA; Donahoe JW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 15540502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of rate of reinforcement and rate of change on choice behaviour in transition.
    Mazur JE
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 May; 50(2):111-28. PubMed ID: 9225619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.
    Ito M; Nakamura K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9465415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal detection and matching: analyzing choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Logue AW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Jan; 39(1):107-27. PubMed ID: 6833936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suboptimal criterion setting in a perceptual choice task with asymmetric reinforcement.
    Stüttgen MC; Kasties N; Lengersdorf D; Starosta S; Güntürkün O; Jäkel F
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jun; 96():59-70. PubMed ID: 23466903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reinforcement context on choice.
    Jacob TC; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 May; 49(3):367-81. PubMed ID: 3385353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.