These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8207354)

  • 1. Delay reduction and optimal foraging: variable-ratio search in a foraging analogue.
    Williams WA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 8207354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determinants of choice for pigeons and humans on concurrent-chains schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Powell RA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Sep; 52(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 2794844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choice and conditioned reinforcement.
    Fantino E; Freed D; Preston RA; Williams WA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 2037826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
    Preston RA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 2037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?
    Zentall TR; Case JP; Andrews DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1952-1957. PubMed ID: 29188447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choice, foraging, and reinforcer duration.
    Ito M; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 3746190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
    Spetch ML; Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 3559459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy budget versus temporal discounting as determinants of preference in risky choice.
    Orduña V; Bouzas A
    Behav Processes; 2004 Sep; 67(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 15240052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.
    Nevin JA; Randolph ; Holland S; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice in a successive-encounters procedure and hyperbolic decay of reinforcement.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Jul; 88(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 17725052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences, not ratios, control choice in an experimental analogue to foraging.
    Fantino E; Goldshmidt JN
    Psychol Sci; 2000 May; 11(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 11273408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Momentary maximizing and optimal foraging theories of performance on concurrent VR schedules.
    MacDonall JS; Goodell J; Juliano A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 16631321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quantitative analysis of sensitivity to the conditioned reinforcing value of terminal-link stimuli in a concurrent-chains schedule.
    Omino T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Nov; 60(3):587-94. PubMed ID: 8283150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic context and pigeons' risk-taking: an integrative approach.
    Goldshmidt JN; Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):133-54. PubMed ID: 15222962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.
    Cohen SL; Riley DS; Weigle PA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Sep; 60(2):255-91. PubMed ID: 8409822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.
    Pliskoff SS; Shull RL; Gollub LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 5660708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context effects on choice.
    Goldshmidt JN; Lattal KM; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 9821681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules.
    Green L; Rachlin H; Hanson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6655424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.