These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8207596)

  • 1. Technique for in vivo measurement of the three-dimensional kinematics and laxity characteristics of the ankle joint complex.
    Siegler S; Wang D; Plasha E; Berman AT
    J Orthop Res; 1994 May; 12(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 8207596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A measurement device for anterior laxity of the ankle joint complex.
    Kerkhoffs GM; Blankevoort L; van Dijk CN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Feb; 20(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 15621328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrumented measurement of anteroposterior and inversion-eversion laxity of the normal ankle joint complex.
    Kovaleski JE; Gurchiek LR; Heitman RJ; Hollis JM; Pearsall AW
    Foot Ankle Int; 1999 Dec; 20(12):808-14. PubMed ID: 10609711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Right to left differences in the ankle joint complex range of motion.
    Stefanyshyn DJ; Engsberg JR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 May; 26(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 8007801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of joint laxity after total ankle arthroplasty: cadaver study.
    Watanabe K; Crevoisier XM; Kitaoka HB; Zhao KD; Berglund LJ; Kaufman KR; An KN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Oct; 24(8):655-60. PubMed ID: 19632017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.
    de Asla RJ; Wan L; Rubash HE; Li G
    J Orthop Res; 2006 May; 24(5):1019-27. PubMed ID: 16609963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of passive motion characteristics of the ankle joint complex using dual Euler angle parameters.
    Ying N; Kim W; Wong Y; Kam BH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 14967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanics of the ankle and subtalar joints revealed through a 3D quasi-static stress MRI technique.
    Siegler S; Udupa JK; Ringleb SI; Imhauser CW; Hirsch BE; Odhner D; Saha PK; Okereke E; Roach N
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):567-78. PubMed ID: 15652556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Ankle-Subtalar-Joint-Complex Laxity Using an Instrumented Ankle Arthrometer: An Experimental Cadaveric Investigation.
    Kovaleski JE; Hollis J; Heitman RJ; Gurchiek LR; Pearsall AW
    J Athl Train; 2002 Dec; 37(4):467-474. PubMed ID: 12937569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of estradiol and progesterone on knee and ankle joint laxity.
    Beynnon BD; Bernstein IM; Belisle A; Brattbakk B; Devanny P; Risinger R; Durant D
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Sep; 33(9):1298-304. PubMed ID: 16002485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living.
    Hemmerich A; Brown H; Smith S; Marthandam SS; Wyss UP
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Apr; 24(4):770-81. PubMed ID: 16514664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of wrist joint laxity.
    van Andel CJ; Roescher WB; Tromp MF; Ritt MJ; Strackee SD; Veeger DH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008; 33(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 18590849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of modified Broström and Evans procedures in simulated lateral ankle injury.
    Fujii T; Kitaoka HB; Watanabe K; Luo ZP; An KN
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Jun; 38(6):1025-31. PubMed ID: 16775540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Passive motion characteristics of the talocrural and the subtalar joint by dual Euler angles.
    Wong Y; Kim W; Ying N
    J Biomech; 2005 Dec; 38(12):2480-5. PubMed ID: 16214496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of pelvic, hip, and knee position on ankle joint range of motion.
    Mitchell B; Bressel E; McNair PJ; Bressel ME
    Phys Ther Sport; 2008 Nov; 9(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 19083721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational modeling to predict mechanical function of joints: application to the lower leg with simulation of two cadaver studies.
    Liacouras PC; Wayne JS
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):811-17. PubMed ID: 18067384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.
    van der Esch M; Steultjens M; Ostelo RW; Harlaar J; Dekker J
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 16332948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of isokinetic ankle dorsiflexor strength measurements in healthy young men and women.
    Holmbäck AM; Porter MM; Downham D; Lexell J
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1999 Dec; 31(4):229-39. PubMed ID: 10599900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between hallux dorsiflexion and ankle joint complex frontal plane kinematics: a preliminary study.
    Halstead J; Turner DE; Redmond AC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jun; 20(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 15836940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Force-displacement relationship during anteroposterior mobilization of the ankle joint.
    de Souza MV; Venturini C; Teixeira LM; Chagas MH; de Resende MA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 18486749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.