These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8208220)

  • 21. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.
    Chan HP; Wei J; Zhang Y; Helvie MA; Moore RH; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4087-95. PubMed ID: 18841861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
    Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms.
    te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jul; 18(7):628-39. PubMed ID: 10504096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of a fully automatic scheme for detection of masses in whole breast ultrasound images.
    Ikedo Y; Fukuoka D; Hara T; Fujita H; Takada E; Endo T; Morita T
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4378-88. PubMed ID: 18072503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An observer study comparing spot imaging regions selected by radiologists and a computer for an automated stereo spot mammography technique.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Lydick JT; Gandra CR; Chen NG; Helvie MA; Bailey JE; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Sahiner B; Petrick NA
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1558-67. PubMed ID: 15259660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
    Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative performance of multiview stereoscopic and mammographic display modalities for breast lesion detection.
    Webb LJ; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA; Ghate SV; Kim C; Soo MS; Walsh R
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1972-80. PubMed ID: 21626930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
    van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ipsilateral-mammogram computer-aided detection of breast cancer.
    Sun X; Qian W; Song D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Apr; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 15081498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic detection of the breast border and nipple position on digital mammograms using genetic algorithm for asymmetry approach to detection of microcalcifications.
    Karnan M; Thangavel K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Jul; 87(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17543415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
    Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yang Y; Rong D; Yao X; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Sep; 49(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 18608020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
    Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bilateral Image Subtraction and Multivariate Models for the Automated Triaging of Screening Mammograms.
    Celaya-Padilla J; Martinez-Torteya A; Rodriguez-Rojas J; Galvan-Tejada J; Treviño V; Tamez-Peña J
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():231656. PubMed ID: 26240818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.