These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8208769)

  • 21. Lipopolysaccharide does not alter behavioral response to successive negative contrast in mice.
    Casaril AM; Vichaya EG; Rishi MR; Ford BG; Dantzer R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Mar; 238(3):691-697. PubMed ID: 33410982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ethanol's effects on operant responding: differentiating reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.
    Petry NM
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Apr; 64(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 9661991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of pimozide on the hedonic properties of sucrose: analysis by the taste reactivity test.
    Leeb K; Parker L; Eikelboom R
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1991 Aug; 39(4):895-901. PubMed ID: 1763109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance effects with repeated-response measures during pimozide-produced dopamine receptor blockade.
    Ettenberg A; Cinsavich SA; White N
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Nov; 11(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 531078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of D-amphetamine.
    Belke TW; Oldford AC; Forgie MY; Beye JA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 16(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 15961961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential effects of clozapine and pimozide on fixed-ratio responding during repeated dosing.
    Wiley JL; Compton AD; Porter JH
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 May; 48(1):253-7. PubMed ID: 8029297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of sucrose availability on wheel-running as an operant and as a reinforcing consequence on a multiple schedule: Additive effects of extrinsic and automatic reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jul; 116():1-7. PubMed ID: 25921837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduced sensitivity to devaluation for instrumental but not consummatory behaviors in binge eating prone rats.
    LeMon JV; Sisk CL; Klump KL; Johnson AW
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Jul; 206():13-21. PubMed ID: 30858100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of pimozide on emitted force, duration and rate of operant response maintained at low and high levels of required force.
    Fowler SC; Gramling SE; Liao RM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Sep; 25(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 3774827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bidirectional effects of dopamine D2 receptor antagonists on responding for a conditioned reinforcer.
    Smith JK; Neill JC; Costall B
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Aug; 57(4):843-9. PubMed ID: 9259014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of pimozide, across doses and within sessions, on discriminated lever release performance in rats.
    Skjoldager P; Fowler SC
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 96(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 3147474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.
    Zhang Z; Rickard JF; Asgari K; Body S; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 May; 179(2):489-97. PubMed ID: 15565430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of pimozide during pairing on the transfer of classical conditioning to an operant discrimination.
    Beninger RJ; Phillips AG
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Jan; 14(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 7465602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic reinforcement from operant wheel-running undermines temporal control by fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Welsh TM
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():91-101. PubMed ID: 30219288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.
    Hunt GE; Atrens DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Aug; 42(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 1513839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement training: failure to observe functional equivalence.
    Tombaugh TN; Anisman H; Tombaugh J
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 70(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 6775330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Female Sprague-Dawley rats display greater appetitive and consummatory responses to alcohol.
    Nieto SJ; Kosten TA
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 327():155-161. PubMed ID: 28365196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative analysis of performance on a progressive-ratio schedule: effects of reinforcer type, food deprivation and acute treatment with Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
    Olarte-Sánchez CM; Valencia-Torres L; Cassaday HJ; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Processes; 2015 Apr; 113():122-31. PubMed ID: 25637881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ethanol- and sucrose-reinforced appetitive and consummatory responding in HAD1, HAD2, and P rats.
    Czachowski CL; Samson HH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2002 Nov; 26(11):1653-61. PubMed ID: 12436053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.