155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8208915)
1. DDD vs. VVI pacing in patients aged over 75 years with complete heart block: a double-blind crossover comparison.
Channon KM; Hargreaves MR; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Q J Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 8208915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study.
Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P
Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].
Chabernaud JM; Guéret P; Blanc P; Bavoux O; Bensaid J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Jan; 86(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8338403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.
Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing].
Lelakowski J; Majewski J; Bednarek J; Szczepkowski J; Machejek J
Przegl Lek; 2001; 58(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11475854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.
Maity AK; Ghosh SP; Dasbiswas A; Chatterjee SS; Chaudhury D; Das MK
Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Non-invasive evaluation of left ventricular function (systolic time interval) in patients using double-chamber pacemakers programmed on DDD and VVI].
Paisana F; Providência LA; Cristóvão J; Faria H; Pêgo M; Calisto J; Morais J; Andrade C; Monteiro V; Gouveia ML
Rev Port Cardiol; 1989 May; 8(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 2631848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block].
Lemke B; Gude J; von Dryander S; Barmeyer J; Braun BE; Krieg M
Z Kardiol; 1990 Aug; 79(8):547-56. PubMed ID: 2145704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing.
Naegeli B; Kurz DJ; Koller D; Straumann E; Furrer M; Maurer D; Minder E; Bertel O
Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.
Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA
Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DDD versus VVIR pacing in patients, ages 70 and over, with complete heart block.
Ouali S; Neffeti E; Ghoul K; Hammas S; Kacem S; Gribaa R; Remedi F; Boughzela E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 May; 33(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 20015129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing versus ventricular backup pacing on exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Passman R; Banthia S; Galvez D; Sheldon T; Kadish A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19140906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of pacing mode on sleep disturbance.
Mizutani N; Waseda K; Asai K; Katou I
J Artif Organs; 2003; 6(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 14598111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A double-blind study of submaximal exercise tolerance and variation in paced rate in atrial synchronous compared to activity sensor modulated ventricular pacing.
Linde-Edelstam C; Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK; Rydén L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jun; 15(6):905-15. PubMed ID: 1376903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dual-chamber DDD pacing in NYHA III-IV functional class dilated cardiomyopathy: short and middle-term evaluation].
Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Francalacci G; Sarasso G; Piccinino C; Pistono M; Marenna B; Paffoni P; Sacchetti M; Inglese E; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1327-35. PubMed ID: 9988941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effects of ventricular demand and dual-chamber pacing models on the long-term clinical outcome and cardiac remodeling in patients with symptomatic bradycardia].
Dong YX; Guo M; Yang YZ; Gao LJ; Cha YM; Xie ZZ; Zhang SL; Sun YH; Wang YQ; Xia YL; Boodhna J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 91(30):2103-7. PubMed ID: 22093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Atrial rate and increased work capacity during DDD pacing in patients with a high level atrioventricular block].
Doupal V; Lukl J; Heinc P
Cor Vasa; 1993; 35(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 8403940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
