155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8208915)
21. The acute effect of cardiac pacing mode on endothelial vasodilation: prospective, double-blind, cross-over, comparative clinical study.
Fak AS; Ozben B; Toprak A; Cincin AA; Papila N; Tanrikulu MA; Oktay A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 18307628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Upgrade to biventricular pacing in patients with conventional pacemakers and heart failure: a double-blind, randomized crossover study.
Höijer CJ; Meurling C; Brandt J
Europace; 2006 Jan; 8(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16627409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing.
Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X
Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Experience with activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing. A study based upon assessment of exercise tolerance.
Kaul U; Sundar AS; Bhatia ML
J Assoc Physicians India; 1989 May; 37(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 2613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison of permanent cardiac pacing and cardiac pacing on demand in mixed carotid sinus syndrome. Acute- and medium-term follow-up study].
Brignole M; Barra M; Sartore B; Menozzi C; Lolli G
G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Jan; 18(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 3384245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of heart rate on the working capacity of patients with complete heart block and physiological pacemaker.
Lukl J; Heinc P
Cor Vasa; 1991; 33(6):506-13. PubMed ID: 1842943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Relative contribution of standard and physiologic stimulation for maximal work capacity in patients with complete atrioventricular block].
Lukl J; Heinc P
Vnitr Lek; 1992 Feb; 38(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 1595197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Permanent variable frequency cardiac pacing: which patients with chronic complete atrioventricular block profit most?].
Lukl J; Doupal V; Heinc P; Hyzák A
Vnitr Lek; 1992 Mar; 38(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 1595213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the effects of VVI versus DDD pacing on cardiac baroreflex function.
Oginosawa Y; Abe H; Yasumasu T; Tsurugi T; Kohno R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 May; 17(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 16684027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurement during VVI and DDD pacing: relationship to symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing.
Channon KM; Hargreaves MR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 1):25-33. PubMed ID: 9121968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of symptoms and intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure during long term dual chamber atrioventricular synchronous (DDD) and ventricular demand (VVI) pacing.
Boon NA; Frew AJ; Johnston JA; Cobbe SM
Br Heart J; 1987 Jul; 58(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 3304370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Autonomic responses to single- and dual-chamber pacing.
Chiladakis JA; Kalogeropoulos A; Manolis AS
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Apr; 93(8):985-9. PubMed ID: 15081440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. "Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices.
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Bostock J; Wells A; Morris R; Sowton E
Br Heart J; 1992 Jan; 67(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 1739528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [VVI mode cardiac pacing: cause or risk factor of cerebral embolism?].
Lascault G; Dürr A; Juillard JB; Thomas D; Frank R; Gautier JC; Grosgogeat Y
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1992 Nov; 85(11):1527-31. PubMed ID: 1300952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Importance of ventricular rate after mode switching during low intensity exercise as assessed by clinical symptoms and ventilatory gas exchange.
Brunner-La Rocca HP; Rickli H; Weilenmann D; Duru F; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 23(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 10666751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Acute effects of ventricular and bicameral stimulation on plasma levels of natriuretic hormone].
Lo Bianco F; Altamura G; Bianconi L; Toscano S; Pandozi C; Castro A; Magliocca V; Gentilucci G; Magris B; Santini M
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Oct; 27(10):1019-23. PubMed ID: 9410771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.
Wilkoff BL;
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 15071277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The choice of stimulation mode in patients with cardioinhibitory or mixed carotid sinus hypersensitivity, with or without associated sinus dysfunction].
Brignole M; Menozzi C; Lolli G; Sartore B; Bertulla A
G Ital Cardiol; 1989 Jan; 19(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 2744311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
