BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8209560)

  • 21. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology.
    Gorab RS; Covino BM; Borden LS
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 8414428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Current practice in primary total hip replacement: results from the National Hip Replacement Outcome Project.
    Best AJ; Fender D; Harper WM; McCaskie AW; Oliver K; Gregg PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 Sep; 80(5):350-5. PubMed ID: 9849338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Results of noncemented revision.
    Dorr LD
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1993 Jan; 4(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 10148096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Choice of hip prosthesis in patients younger than 50 years].
    Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Veth RP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1918-22. PubMed ID: 17907541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early prosthetic complications after unipolar hemiarthroplasty.
    Weinrauch PC; Moore WR; Shooter DR; Wilkinson MP; Bonrath EM; Dedy NJ; McMeniman TJ; Jabur MK; Whitehouse SL; Crawford RW
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 16768762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs.
    D'Lima DD; Oishi CS; Petersilge WJ; Colwell CW; Walker RH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):140-8. PubMed ID: 9553546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Replacement of total hip prosthesis--what does the patient expect? Analysis of 248 aseptic hip revisions].
    Brunazzi MG; Mcharo CN; Ochsner PE
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Nov; 126(47):2013-20. PubMed ID: 8984609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term survival analysis of total hip replacement.
    Birtwistle SJ; Wilson K; Porter ML
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1996 May; 78(3 ( Pt 1)):180-3. PubMed ID: 8779498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Heterotopic bone in hip arthroplasties. Cemented versus noncemented.
    Duck HJ; Mylod AG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Sep; (282):145-53. PubMed ID: 1516305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Cemented or cementless joint prostheses? A review of the principles of prosthesis fixation].
    Carlsson A; Linder L
    Lakartidningen; 1986 Jun; 83(26-27):2381-4. PubMed ID: 3736284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Total blood loss in major joint arthroplasty. A comparison of cemented and noncemented hip and knee operations.
    Hays MB; Mayfield JF
    J Arthroplasty; 1988; 3 Suppl():S47-9. PubMed ID: 3199139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraoperative complications during total hip arthroplasty.
    Patterson BM; Lieberman JR; Salvati EA
    Orthopedics; 1995 Nov; 18(11):1089-95. PubMed ID: 8559694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Critical review of 2 series of Charnley-type total hip prostheses in subjects over and under 50].
    Cabitza P; Giancola R
    Arch Sci Med (Torino); 1982; 139(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 7138289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The postero-lateral approach for total hip prosthesis.
    Aglietti P; Salvati E
    Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1981 Aug; 7(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 7347328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Total joint replacement: where are we today, and where are we headed?
    Volz RG
    South Med J; 1989 Feb; 82(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 2644697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Complications observed in a series of 2018 total hip replacement (author's transl)].
    Katzner M; Babin S; Schvingt E
    Nouv Presse Med; 1982 Jan; 11(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 7058138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Revision arthroplasty of the hip. Some current methods for reducing failure in this branch of surgery.
    Fox JA
    Nurs Times; 1980 Oct; 76(44):1930-3. PubMed ID: 6903969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Hip prosthesis II. Total hip prostheses. The patient: before, during and after the intervention].
    Sedel L
    Rev Infirm; 1989 Dec; 39(19):43-8. PubMed ID: 2485940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.