These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8209846)
1. Ambient noise levels in industrial audiometric test rooms. Frank T; Williams DL Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 May; 55(5):433-7. PubMed ID: 8209846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards. Lankford JE; Perrone DC; Thunder TD AAOHN J; 1999 Apr; 47(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 10418346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ANSI update: maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. Frank T Am J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 9(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 10943020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ambient noise levels in audiometric test rooms used for clinical audiometry. Frank T; Williams DL Ear Hear; 1993 Dec; 14(6):414-22. PubMed ID: 8307246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds. Frank T; Williams DL J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry. Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration matters: II. Measurement of ambient noise in test rooms/areas. Chung K J Commun Disord; 2023; 101():106293. PubMed ID: 36580859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mobile soundproof booth for audiometric industrial testing]. Grzesik J; Kowalska H; Pawlas K Med Pr; 1977; 28(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 865269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing. Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of daily noise exposures in one workplace based on noise criteria recommended by ACGIH and OSHA. Petrick ME; Royster LH; Royster JD; Reist P Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Oct; 57(10):924-8. PubMed ID: 8865602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold. Berger EH; Killion MC J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of industrial hearing conservation programs: a review and analysis. Melnick W Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Jul; 45(7):459-67. PubMed ID: 6464993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noise attenuation characteristics of the MX-41/AR and the Telephonics circumaural audiometric headsets. Bienvenue GR; Michael PL J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 721665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Acoustic Test Environment for Hearing Testing. Margolis RH; Madsen B J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Oct; 26(9):784-91. PubMed ID: 26415972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study. Job A; Raynal M; Kossowski M; Studler M; Ghernaouti C; Baffioni-Venturi A; Roux A; Darolles C; Guelorget A Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):10-6. PubMed ID: 19249340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations of occupational air contaminant standards, as exemplified by the neurotoxin N-hexane. Lanska DJ J Public Health Policy; 1999; 20(4):441-58. PubMed ID: 10643170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]