130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8211229)
1. Mammographic screening: an historical perspective.
Feig SA
Semin Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 28(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 8211229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography: better, safer, and more effective?
Linton OW; Schauer DA
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 16793970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The regulation of mammography.
Bassett LW
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1996 Oct; 17(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 8896108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What have we learned from the breast cancer detection demonstration project? 1986.
Gilbert FI; Low G
Hawaii Med J; 1995 Jun; 54(6):615-7. PubMed ID: 7642366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How did the PSA system arise?
Justman S
J R Soc Med; 2010 Aug; 103(8):309-12. PubMed ID: 20610619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The history of development and perspectives of breast cancer surgery.
Kułakowski A
Przegl Lek; 2000; 57 Suppl 5():110-2. PubMed ID: 11202269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of periodic breast cancer screening with mammography: methodology and early observations. 1966.
Shapiro S; Strax P; Venet L
CA Cancer J Clin; 1990; 40(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 2106369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Screening of breast carcinoma screening in the Czech Republic requires cooperation with surgeons].
Skovajsová M
Rozhl Chir; 2012 Mar; 91(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 22881076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evolution of mammography.
Gold RH
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 1732920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution of the team approach in breast cancer.
Egan RL
Cancer; 1975 Nov; 36(5):1815-22. PubMed ID: 1104140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of mammography.
Bassett LW; Gold RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 3277343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiologist for outstanding scientific work with the Gustav Bucky Award 2013].
Renz D
Rofo; 2013 Jun; 185(6):531. PubMed ID: 23740711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [75th anniversary of the first mammography].
Semiglazov VF; Vesnin AG
Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 2648679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The development of breast radiology: the
Zackrisson S; Andersson I
Acta Radiol; 2021 Nov; 62(11):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 34709078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Mammography in the USA].
Linton OW
J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 75(10):493-6. PubMed ID: 7799270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Robert L. Egan.
Linton O
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):338-9. PubMed ID: 17467619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Mammographic screening is a reliable examination method].
Dean PB
Lakartidningen; 2001 Dec; 98(51-52):5924-6. PubMed ID: 11806274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should women 40 to 49 years of age be offered mammographic screening?
Trop I; Deck W
Can Fam Physician; 2006 Sep; 52(9):1050-2. PubMed ID: 17279208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality assured images in mammographic screening. Assessment criteria as a basis for national guidelines].
Ståhl M; Edström C
Lakartidningen; 2001 Mar; 98(10):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11301976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening mammography under age 50.
Antman K; Shea S
JAMA; 1999 Apr; 281(16):1470-2. PubMed ID: 10227298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
