369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8213508)
1. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S; Wexler L; Ludbrook PA; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; VanFossen DB
Kidney Int; 1995 Jan; 47(1):254-61. PubMed ID: 7731155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of low- with high-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Identification of criteria for selective use.
Matthai WH; Kussmaul WG; Krol J; Goin JE; Schwartz JS; Hirshfeld JW
Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):291-301. PubMed ID: 8281660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of iohexol and diatrizoate-meglumine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Pelech AN; Allard SM; Hurd RT; Giddins NG; Collins GF
Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 1885274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The comparative effects of ionic versus nonionic agents in cardiac catheterization.
Benotti JR
Invest Radiol; 1988 Nov; 23 Suppl 2():S366-73. PubMed ID: 3058641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine.
Cooper MW; Reed PJ
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pain in peripheral arteriography: an assessment of conventional versus ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast agents.
Murphy G; Campbell DR; Fraser DB
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1988 Jun; 39(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 2967829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.
Bettmann MA; Higgins CB
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
Bettmann MA; Bourdillon PD; Barry WH; Brush KA; Levin DC
Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications of cardiac angiography using low- or high-osmolality contrast agents in patients with left main coronary stenosis.
Kussmaul WG; Mishra JP; Matthai WH; Hirshfeld JW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Dec; 42(4):376-9. PubMed ID: 9408613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Iohexol cerebral angiography. Multicenter clinical trial.
Kido DK; Potts DG; Bryan RN; Norman D; Pelz DM; Fox AJ; Shaw DD
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S55-7. PubMed ID: 3882617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol.
Cacayorin ED; Bernstein AD; Fruehan CT; Lee SH; Kieffer SA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 6410736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media.
Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL
Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
