These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 821389)

  • 1. Laboratory evaluation of a commercial microbial control system.
    Borchardt KA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 May; 9(5):771-5. PubMed ID: 821389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Antibiotic susceptibility testing by the disk method. Comparative evaluation of 5 commercial systems].
    Margalejo H; Brun Y; Messy P; Fleurette J
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1984 Jun; 32(5 Pt 2):483-7. PubMed ID: 6431378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility test results: how guilty a laboratory could be?
    Nassar MSM; Hazzah WA; Bakr WMK
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2019; 94(1):4. PubMed ID: 30686832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms.
    Ceri H; Olson ME; Stremick C; Read RR; Morck D; Buret A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1771-6. PubMed ID: 10325322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Susceptibility testing quality control studies with fosfomycin tromethamine.
    Fuchs PC; Barry AL; Brown SD
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Jul; 16(7):538-40. PubMed ID: 9272392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishing quality control ranges for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus: a cornerstone to develop reference strains for Korean clinical microbiology laboratories.
    Hong SK; Choi SJ; Shin S; Lee W; Pinto N; Shin N; Lee K; Hong SG; Kim YA; Lee H; Kim H; Song W; Lee SH; Yong D; Lee K; Chong Y
    Ann Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 35(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 26354353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Melittin and its potential in the destruction and inhibition of the biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from bovine milk.
    Picoli T; Peter CM; Zani JL; Waller SB; Lopes MG; Boesche KN; Vargas GDÁ; Hübner SO; Fischer G
    Microb Pathog; 2017 Nov; 112():57-62. PubMed ID: 28943153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of 34 antimicrobial agents for control strains Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853.
    Fass RJ; Barnishan J
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Nov; 16(5):622-4. PubMed ID: 118705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Interlaboratory quality control of the agar diffusion test for determining sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics].
    Garanina EN; Givental' NI; Andreeva ZM; Verenchikova IaV; Ginzburg AI
    Lab Delo; 1984; (1):43-6. PubMed ID: 6199568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facilitating quality control of the antimicrobial susceptibility test.
    Fluornoy DJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):231-2. PubMed ID: 6780602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proposed mezlocillin disk control values for staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853.
    Prior RB; Fass RJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Mar; 77(3):332-3. PubMed ID: 6462053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New derivatives of benzimidazole and their antimicrobial activity.
    Cetínkaya E; Alici B; Gök Y; Durmaz R; Günal S
    J Chemother; 1999 Apr; 11(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 10326736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of 44 antimicrobial agents against three standard control strains in broth with and without human serum.
    Reimer LG; Stratton CW; Reller LB
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Jun; 19(6):1050-5. PubMed ID: 6791584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab and disc methods.
    Snell JJ; Danvers MV; Gardner PS
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Sep; 37(9):1059-65. PubMed ID: 6432855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Standardization of methods of determining microbial sensitivity to antibiotics].
    Chaĭkovskaia SM; Givental' NI; Rezvan SP
    Lab Delo; 1984; (5):299-302. PubMed ID: 6204116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antibacterial activity of crude methanolic extract and its fractions of aerial parts of Anthemis tinctoria.
    Akgul C; Saglikoglu G
    Indian J Biochem Biophys; 2005 Dec; 42(6):395-7. PubMed ID: 16955742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretive standards and quality control guidelines for imipenem susceptibility tests with 10-micrograms disks.
    Barry AL; Thornsberry C; Gavan TL; Jones RN
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):988-9. PubMed ID: 6439736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Basis for nebulized antibiotics: droplet characterization and in vitro antimicrobial activity versus Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Todisco T; Eslami A; Baglioni S; Sposini T; Tascini C; Sommer E; Knoch M
    J Aerosol Med; 2000; 13(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10947319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of efficacy of three commercially available antibiotic discs.
    Joshi A; Iyer V; Balasubramaniam U; Kagal A; Bharadwaj R
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2008; 26(2):160-2. PubMed ID: 18445955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Growth media and assay plate material can impact on the effectiveness of cationic biocides and antibiotics against different bacterial species.
    Bock LJ; Hind CK; Sutton JM; Wand ME
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2018 May; 66(5):368-377. PubMed ID: 29432643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.