214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8214699)
1. Excitatory effects and electroencephalographic correlation of etomidate, thiopental, methohexital, and propofol.
Reddy RV; Moorthy SS; Dierdorf SF; Deitch RD; Link L
Anesth Analg; 1993 Nov; 77(5):1008-11. PubMed ID: 8214699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Etomidate for Seizure Duration in Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Singh PM; Arora S; Borle A; Varma P; Trikha A; Goudra BG
J ECT; 2015 Dec; 31(4):213-25. PubMed ID: 25634566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of four intravenous anesthetic agents on motor evoked potentials elicited by magnetic transcranial stimulation.
Taniguchi M; Nadstawek J; Langenbach U; Bremer F; Schramm J
Neurosurgery; 1993 Sep; 33(3):407-15; discussion 415. PubMed ID: 8413871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The comparative effects of methohexital, propofol, and etomidate for electroconvulsive therapy.
Avramov MN; Husain MM; White PF
Anesth Analg; 1995 Sep; 81(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 7653829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Adverse effects reported after inductive doses of the intravenous anesthetics, thiopentone, etomidate and propofol].
Djordjević B; Stojiljković MP; Loncar-Stojiljković D; Krivokapić D; Adamov A
Vojnosanit Pregl; 1999; 56(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 10437419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative hemodynamic study of anesthesia induction with propofol (Diprivan), thiopental, methohexital, etomidate and midazolam in patients with coronary disease].
Kling D; Laubenthal H; Börner U; Boldt J; Hempelmann G
Anaesthesist; 1987 Oct; 36(10):541-7. PubMed ID: 3318546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Growth of Staphylococcus aureus in four intravenous anesthetics.
Sosis MB; Braverman B
Anesth Analg; 1993 Oct; 77(4):766-8. PubMed ID: 8214662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Propofol, Etomidate, and Thiopental in Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
Canbek O; Ipekcıoglu D; Menges OO; Atagun MI; Karamustafalıoglu N; Cetinkaya OZ; Ilnem MC
J ECT; 2015 Jun; 31(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 25268043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of propofol, etomidate, and thiopental on intraocular pressure and hemodynamic responses in phacoemulsification by insertion of laryngeal mask airway.
Alipour M; Derakhshan A; Pourmazar R; Abrishami M; Ghanbarabadi VG
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2014 Oct; 30(8):665-9. PubMed ID: 24991995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiovascular effects of anesthesia in ECT: a randomized, double-blind comparison of etomidate, propofol, and thiopental.
Rosa MA; Rosa MO; Marcolin MA; Fregni F
J ECT; 2007 Mar; 23(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 17435563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic agents in electroconvulsive therapy.
Swaim JC; Mansour M; Wydo SM; Moore JL
J ECT; 2006 Dec; 22(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 17143154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ICI 35868, etomidate and methohexitone for day-case anaesthesia.
Wells JK
Br J Anaesth; 1985 Aug; 57(8):732-5. PubMed ID: 3874641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnesium sulfate pretreatment reduces myoclonus after etomidate.
Guler A; Satilmis T; Akinci SB; Celebioglu B; Kanbak M
Anesth Analg; 2005 Sep; 101(3):705-709. PubMed ID: 16115978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anaesthesia for laparoscopy. A comparison of five techniques including propofol, etomidate, thiopentone and isoflurane.
de Grood PM; Harbers JB; van Egmond J; Crul JF
Anaesthesia; 1987 Aug; 42(8):815-23. PubMed ID: 2959168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Etomidate and thiopental-based anesthetic induction: comparisons between different titrated levels of electrophysiologic cortical depression and response to laryngoscopy.
Jellish WS; Riche H; Salord F; Ravussin P; Tempelhoff R
J Clin Anesth; 1997 Feb; 9(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 9051544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of side effects of methohexital and thiopental with propanidid.
Dundee JW
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1965; 17():77-8. PubMed ID: 5866700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The superiority of ketofol and etomidate against propofol or thiopental anesthesia for ECT.
Gurel SC; Ozden HC; Karahan S; Ayhan Y
Asian J Psychiatr; 2022 Jun; 72():103090. PubMed ID: 35390580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Convulsive thresholds in mice during the recovery phase from anaesthesia induced by propofol, thiopentone, methohexitone and etomidate.
Lowson S; Gent JP; Goodchild CS
Br J Pharmacol; 1991 Apr; 102(4):879-82. PubMed ID: 1855117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of induction characteristics of four intravenous anaesthetic agents.
McCollum JS; Dundee JW
Anaesthesia; 1986 Oct; 41(10):995-1000. PubMed ID: 3491551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a small priming dose on myoclonic movements after intravenous anaesthesia induction with Etomidate-Lipuro in children.
Nyman Y; von Hofsten K; Ritzmo C; Eksborg S; Lönnqvist PA
Br J Anaesth; 2011 Aug; 107(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 21632605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
