These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8214793)

  • 1. Direct bond brackets: cotton roll versus rubber dam isolation.
    Heringer M; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 8214793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct bonding brackets: unfilled versus unfilled/filled resins.
    Barreto LC; Chevitarese O; Almeida MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 19(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 7865420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.
    Adanir N; Türkkahraman H; Yalçin Güngör A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 19073952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth.
    Endo T; Ozoe R; Shinkai K; Shimomura J; Katoh Y; Shimooka S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18675200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing.
    Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 15681012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to various esthetic pontic materials.
    Maryanchik I; Brendlinger EJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 20451789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro study of the effect of Pro Seal varnish on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    El Bokle D; Munir H
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18575308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with Self-Etching Primer.
    Romano FL; Tavares SW; Nouer DF; Consani S; Borges de Araújo Magnani MB
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):849-53. PubMed ID: 16285044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 19752016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.