BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8215101)

  • 21. Cochlear implant efficiency in pre- and postlingually deaf subjects. A study with H2(15)O and PET.
    Okazawa H; Naito Y; Yonekura Y; Sadato N; Hirano S; Nishizawa S; Magata Y; Ishizu K; Tamaki N; Honjo I; Konishi J
    Brain; 1996 Aug; 119 ( Pt 4)():1297-306. PubMed ID: 8813292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The contribution of visual areas to speech comprehension: a PET study in cochlear implants patients and normal-hearing subjects.
    Giraud AL; Truy E
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1562-9. PubMed ID: 11985837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Mar; 122(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 17517160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting cochlear implant outcome from brain organisation in the deaf.
    Giraud AL; Lee HJ
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):381-90. PubMed ID: 17943013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf.
    Gordon KA; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Brain; 2013 May; 136(Pt 5):1609-25. PubMed ID: 23576127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cortical activation in profoundly deaf patients during cochlear implant stimulation demonstrated by H2(15)O PET.
    Herzog H; Lamprecht A; Kühn A; Roden W; Vosteen KH; Feinendegen LE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1991; 15(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 1851187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural plasticity detected in short- and long-term cochlear implant users using PET.
    Nishimura H; Doi K; Iwaki T; Hashikawa K; Oku N; Teratani T; Hasegawa T; Watanabe A; Nishimura T; Kubo T
    Neuroreport; 2000 Mar; 11(4):811-5. PubMed ID: 10757525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ultrasound activates the auditory cortex of profoundly deaf subjects.
    Imaizumi S; Hosoi H; Sakaguchi T; Watanabe Y; Sadato N; Nakamura S; Waki A; Yonekura Y
    Neuroreport; 2001 Mar; 12(3):583-6. PubMed ID: 11234768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pre-operative Brain Imaging Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Helps Predict Cochlear Implant Outcome in Deaf Adults.
    Anderson CA; Wiggins IM; Kitterick PT; Hartley DEH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 20(5):511-528. PubMed ID: 31286300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual Processing Recruits the Auditory Cortices in Prelingually Deaf Children and Influences Cochlear Implant Outcomes.
    Liang M; Chen Y; Zhao F; Zhang J; Liu J; Zhang X; Cai Y; Chen S; Li X; Chen L; Zheng Y
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):1104-1111. PubMed ID: 28727651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Glucose metabolism in the primary auditory cortex of postlingually deaf patients: an FDG-PET study.
    Okuda T; Nagamachi S; Ushisako Y; Tono T
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2013; 75(6):342-9. PubMed ID: 24435067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Brain function of cochlear implant users.
    Honjo I
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():42-4. PubMed ID: 11892206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory cortex activity changes in long-term sensorineural deprivation during crude cochlear electrical stimulation: evaluation by positron emission tomography.
    Truy E; Deiber MP; Cinotti L; Mauguière F; Froment JC; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1995 Jun; 86(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 8567419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical activity and speech perception performance in cochlear implant users.
    Fujiki N; Naito Y; Hirano S; Kojima H; Shiomi Y; Nishizawa S; Konishi J; Honjo I
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():32-5. PubMed ID: 11892178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users.
    Sandmann P; Dillier N; Eichele T; Meyer M; Kegel A; Pascual-Marqui RD; Marcar VL; Jäncke L; Debener S
    Brain; 2012 Feb; 135(Pt 2):555-68. PubMed ID: 22232592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cortical activation with sound stimulation in cochlear implant users demonstrated by positron emission tomography.
    Naito Y; Okazawa H; Honjo I; Hirano S; Takahashi H; Shiomi Y; Hoji W; Kawano M; Ishizu K; Yonekura Y
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1995 Jul; 2(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 7580402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Reveals Auditory and Frontal Cortical Regions Involved with Speech Perception and Loudness Adaptation.
    Berding G; Wilke F; Rode T; Haense C; Joseph G; Meyer GJ; Mamach M; Lenarz M; Geworski L; Bengel FM; Lenarz T; Lim HH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128743. PubMed ID: 26046763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome.
    Lee HJ; Giraud AL; Kang E; Oh SH; Kang H; Kim CS; Lee DS
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Apr; 17(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 16731883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cortical activations in sequential bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 21756453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.