These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8215991)

  • 1. The practicability of finite-element analysis for assessing changes in human craniofacial morphology from cephalographs.
    Ayoub AF; Stirrups DR
    Arch Oral Biol; 1993 Aug; 38(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 8215991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in craniofacial size and shape with two modes of orthodontic treatment.
    Book D; Lavelle C
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1988; 8(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 3209684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An analysis of orthodontically induced changes in craniofacial form.
    Lavelle CL
    Anat Anz; 1988; 166(1-5):165-73. PubMed ID: 3189830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
    Lim KF; Foong KW
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Craniofacial changes in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with the RAMPA system.
    Mitani Y; Banabilh SM; Singh GD
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(2):19-25. PubMed ID: 20687312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
    Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element method modeling of craniofacial growth.
    Moss ML; Skalak R; Patel H; Sen K; Moss-Salentijn L; Shinozuka M; Vilmann H
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Jun; 87(6):453-72. PubMed ID: 3859222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: implications and suggestions for clinical applications.
    Ward RE; Jamison PL
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1991; 11(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 1761648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brief communication: measurement size, precision, and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: bigger is better.
    Jamison PL; Ward RE
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 Apr; 90(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 8476006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The allometric center. The biological basis of an analytical model of craniofacial growth.
    Moss ML; Skalak R; Moss-Salentijn L; Dasgupta GM; Vilmann H; Mehta P
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1981; 77(1-3):119-28. PubMed ID: 7255402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Delaire's craniofacial architectural analysis. A reminder of the changes introduced by its designer in 1994].
    Mercier J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2000 Jan; 101(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10738748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Describing a craniofacial anomaly: finite elements and the biometrics of landmark locations.
    Bookstein FL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1987 Dec; 74(4):495-509. PubMed ID: 3442300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer prediction of hard tissue profiles in orthognathic surgery.
    Loh S; Yow M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 12593006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probabilistic finite element analysis of a craniofacial finite element model.
    Berthaume MA; Dechow PC; Iriarte-Diaz J; Ross CF; Strait DS; Wang Q; Grosse IR
    J Theor Biol; 2012 May; 300():242-53. PubMed ID: 22306513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of a Novel Semi-Automatic Technique for Determining the Bilateral Symmetry Plane of the Facial Skeleton of Normal Adult Males.
    Roumeliotis G; Willing R; Neuert M; Ahluwalia R; Jenkyn T; Yazdani A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1997-2001. PubMed ID: 26355983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element growth analysis for the craniofacial skeleton in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Sasaki A; Takeshita S; Publico AS; Moss ML; Tanaka E; Ishino Y; Watanabe M; Tanne K
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Mar; 26(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 15036178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision of cephalometric analysis via fully and semiautomatic evaluation of digital lateral cephalographs.
    Sommer T; Ciesielski R; Erbersdobler J; Orthuber W; Fischer-Brandies H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 19700534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The sagittal relation of the craniofacial skeletal base as analysed by 3 cephalometric methods based respectively on angle, line and arch value].
    Miotti F
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1983; 2(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 6583174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.