These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8217638)
41. [Advantages and disadvantages of standardized nursing terms: not the "if", but the "how" is the question]. Wieteck P Pflege Z; 2004 May; 57(5):334-7. PubMed ID: 15206182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Internal properties of the CASH nursing care evaluation instrument. Smith RL Health Serv Res; 1975; 10(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 1219002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Is your documentation like a bunch of cows? Makey GE J Christ Nurs; 2008; 25(4):210-2. PubMed ID: 18856041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Evaluation of the quality of nursing care: qualitative and quantitative analysis on a sample of nursing documents]. Bollini G; Zaza R; Bottani D; Lolli A Prof Inferm; 2006; 59(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 16945223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review. Wang N; Hailey D; Yu P J Adv Nurs; 2011 Sep; 67(9):1858-75. PubMed ID: 21466578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The burden of bureaucracy. Lomas C Nurs Stand; 2012 Mar 28-Apr 3; 26(30):22-4. PubMed ID: 22655409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Outcome of a quality assurance review: development of a documentation tool for chemotherapy administration. Pevny V Oncol Nurs Forum; 1993 Apr; 20(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 8497421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. What nurses learn from nursing audit. Moore KR Nurs Outlook; 1979 Apr; 27(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 254888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Patient education documentation: is it being done? Cook L; Castrogiovanni A; David D; Stephenson DW; Dickson M; Smith D; Bonney A Medsurg Nurs; 2008 Oct; 17(5):306-10. PubMed ID: 19051976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Documentation and reality. Can quality in nursing be measured?]. Hamran T Sykepleien; 1987 Oct; 74(17):10-5, 48. PubMed ID: 3686372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Computerized clinical pathways (care plans): piloting a strategy to enhance quality patient care. Hyde E; Murphy B Clin Nurse Spec; 2012; 26(5):277-82. PubMed ID: 22903208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Quality of nursing documentation: Paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records. Akhu-Zaheya L; Al-Maaitah R; Bany Hani S J Clin Nurs; 2018 Feb; 27(3-4):e578-e589. PubMed ID: 28981172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluating the introduction of a paediatric emergency nurse practitioner service. Organ K; Chinnick P; Higgison I; Stanhope B; Hoskins R; Benger J Emerg Nurse; 2005 Nov; 13(7):8-11. PubMed ID: 16318063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Nursing diagnosis in home care: audit tool development. Zink MR J Community Health Nurs; 1994; 11(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 8201369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Exploring common deficiencies that occur in record keeping. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2005 May 26-Jun 8; 14(10):568-70. PubMed ID: 15928574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Structure and content in Norwegian nursing care documentation. Stokke TA; Kalfoss MH Scand J Caring Sci; 1999; 13(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 10476190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Long-term increase in quality of nursing documentation: effects of a comprehensive intervention. Björvell C; Wredling R; Thorell-Ekstrand I Scand J Caring Sci; 2002 Mar; 16(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11985747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Improved quality of nursing documentation: results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes implementation study. Müller-Staub M; Needham I; Odenbreit M; Lavin MA; van Achterberg T Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2007; 18(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 17430533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]