These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8217656)

  • 1. No limits. Project 2000: born in the P2K.
    Blackburn M
    Nurs Stand; 1993 Sep 15-21; 7(52):50-1. PubMed ID: 8217656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. P2K or not P2K?
    Orr J
    Nurs Times; 1988 Jul 13-19; 84(28):23. PubMed ID: 3405840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No limits. From slaughterhouse to staff nurses via P2000.
    Eaton T
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Jan 3-9; 10(15):53. PubMed ID: 8695390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Project 2000. Staying the course.
    Crabbe G
    Nurs Times; 1989 Sep 13-19; 85(37):33-6. PubMed ID: 2813110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modern studies.
    Marsland L
    Nurs Times; 1993 Apr 14-20; 89(15):33-4. PubMed ID: 8483736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Project 2000. A new role for staff nurses: the effects of supernumerary students.
    Wilson A
    Prof Nurse; 1989 Nov; 5(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 2594792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changing nursing students' attitudes--an exploratory study.
    Davidhizar R; Farabaugh N; Giger JN
    Hosp Top; 1994; 72(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 10137789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tradimus. Nursing class heroes: Project 2000 is.
    Warriner J
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Jun 5-11; 5(37):55. PubMed ID: 1907169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Students' perceptions of Project 2000.
    Ford C
    Nurs Stand; 1992 May 6-12; 6(33):30-2. PubMed ID: 1591181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nursing students can only hope that Project 2000 goes ahead.
    O'Dwyer G; Wood S
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1987 Apr; (492):5. PubMed ID: 3646487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Students: why Project 2000?
    Perry J
    Nurs Stand; 1990 Mar 14-20; 4(25):47. PubMed ID: 2111482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of nursing education.
    Theobald M
    Nurs Times; 1985 Feb 6-12; 81(6):48. PubMed ID: 3844781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No limits. Rivalry: all together now.
    Cruikshank C
    Nurs Stand; 1994 Jan 5-11; 8(15):49. PubMed ID: 8123513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tradimus. An end to the Project.
    Osborne R
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Oct 21-27; 7(5):48. PubMed ID: 1450029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Education. The pitfalls of Project 2000.
    Stevenson D
    Nurs Times; 1996 Jan 3-9; 92(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 8684953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No limits. Traditional courses: the case of the missing tutors.
    Stevenson P
    Nurs Stand; 1993 Sep 15-21; 7(52):52. PubMed ID: 8217657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tradimus. Project 2000: look back in danger.
    Flatt S
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Jun 24-30; 6(40):50. PubMed ID: 1643007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No limits. Why is our maturity not valued?
    Leary A
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Jan 3-9; 10(15):53. PubMed ID: 8695391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Project 2000. The supernumerary student.
    Fardell J
    Nurs Times; 1988 Aug 10-16; 84(32):32-3. PubMed ID: 3412952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospitals without students: Toowoomba nurses look to the future.
    Cantly C
    Qld Nurse; 1984; 3(10):30-2. PubMed ID: 6440221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.