These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8218623)

  • 1. Theory of the determination of systolic time intervals by impedance cardiography.
    Visser KR; Mook GA; van der Wall E; Zijlstra WG
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Aug; 36(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8218623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impedance cardiography for cardiac output estimation in pacemaker patients: review of the literature.
    Ovsyshcher I; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jul; 16(7 Pt 1):1412-22. PubMed ID: 7689207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative measures of systolic ejection during treadmill exercise by impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography.
    Kizakevich PN; Teague SM; Nissman DB; Jochem WJ; Niclou R; Sharma MK
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Aug; 36(1-2):51-61. PubMed ID: 8218624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer determination of systolic time intervals based on impedance cardiography.
    Szilágyi N; Láng E; Balázs L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 Jul; 13(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 1522032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous acquisition of functional magnetic resonance images and impedance cardiography.
    Cieslak M; Ryan WS; Macy A; Kelsey RM; Cornick JE; Verket M; Blascovich J; Grafton S
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Apr; 52(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 25410526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative measurements of left ventricular ejection time by mechano-, echo- and electrical impedance cardiography.
    Stern HC; Wolf GK; Belz GG
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1985; 35(10):1582-6. PubMed ID: 4074418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pre-ejection period as a cardiac cotractility index: noninvasive beat-by-beat evaluation in the human study].
    Khaiutin VM; Lukoshkova EV; Ermishkin VV; Sonina RS
    Usp Fiziol Nauk; 2009; 40(4):3-20. PubMed ID: 19886186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous noninvasive monitoring of left ventricular function during exercise by thoracic impedance cardiography-automated derivation of systolic time intervals.
    Sheps DS; Petrovick ML; Kizakevich PN; Wolfe C; Craige E
    Am Heart J; 1982 Apr; 103(4 Pt 1):519-24. PubMed ID: 7064793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac output by impedance cardiography: two alternative methodologies compared with thermodilution.
    Sherwood A; Carter LS; Murphy CA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Feb; 62(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 2001207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thoracocardiographic-derived left ventricular systolic time intervals.
    Bloch KE; Jugoon S; Sackner MA
    Chest; 1994 Dec; 106(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 7988182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Where to B in dZ/dt.
    Lozano DL; Norman G; Knox D; Wood BL; Miller BD; Emery CF; Berntson GG
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17241147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemodynamic evaluation in pregnancy: limitations of impedance cardiography.
    Moertl MG; Schlembach D; Papousek I; Hinghofer-Szalkay H; Weiss EM; Lang U; Lackner HK
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Jun; 33(6):1015-26. PubMed ID: 22562970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beat-to-beat evaluation of systolic time intervals during bicycle exercise using impedance cardiography.
    Ono T; Miyamura M; Yasuda Y; Ito T; Saito T; Ishiguro T; Yoshizawa M; Yambe T
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2004 May; 203(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 15185968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output: studies in rabbits.
    Pappas CG; Wang X; Connolly RJ; Schwaitzberg SD
    J Surg Res; 1995 Oct; 59(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 7564325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal fidelity requirements for deriving impedance cardiographic measures of cardiac function over a broad heart rate range.
    Hurwitz BE; Shyu LY; Lu CC; Reddy SP; Schneiderman N; Nagel JH
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Aug; 36(1-2):3-21. PubMed ID: 8218621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlations between ejection times measured from the carotid pulse contour and the impedance cardiogram.
    Frey MA; Doerr BM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Oct; 54(10):894-7. PubMed ID: 6651710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of impedance cardiography during exercise.
    Miles DS; Cox MH; Verde TJ; Gotshall RW
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Aug; 36(1-2):119-29. PubMed ID: 8218618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiating systolic from diastolic heart failure using impedance cardiography.
    Summers RL; Kolb JC; Woodward LH; Galli RL
    Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Jul; 6(7):693-9. PubMed ID: 10433528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of systolic time intervals measured by impedance cardiography and carotid pulse tracing.
    Mehlsen J; Bonde J; Rehling M; Tangø M; Trap-Jensen J
    Dan Med Bull; 1990 Feb; 37(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 2311438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timing of the carotid arterial sounds in normal adult men: measurement of left ventricular ejection, pre-ejection period and pulse transmission time.
    Hasegawa M; Rodbard D; Kinoshita Y
    Cardiology; 1991; 78(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 2070371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.