These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Onset of auditory deprivation. Hurley RM J Am Acad Audiol; 1999; 10(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 10613349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings. Silman S; Silverman CA; Emmer MB; Gelfand SA J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 8126657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recovery of speech perception performance after prolonged auditory deprivation: case study. Boothroyd A J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):331-6; discussion 336-7. PubMed ID: 8219300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss. Gelfand SA; Silman S; Ross L Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 3438702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids. Carter AS; Noe CM; Wilson RH J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent auditory deprivation from monaural amplification and recovery with binaural amplification: two case studies. Silverman CA; Silman S J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Oct; 1(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 2132601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss. Jacobson JT; McCandless GA; Mahoney TM Audiology; 1979; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of the cued-listening task in the evaluation of binaural hearing aids. Jerger J; Darling R; Florin E J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Sep; 5(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 7987016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids. Ricketts T Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acceptance of noise with monaural and binaural amplification. Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Burchfield SB J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Oct; 17(9):659-66. PubMed ID: 17039768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of interaural speech-recognition differences on binaural advantage for speech in noise. McCullough JA; Abbas PJ J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 1421457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonsense-syllable recognition in noise using monaural and binaural listening strategies. Arsenault MD; Punch JL J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1821-30. PubMed ID: 10089605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the unaided ear effect independent of auditory aging? Hurley RM J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Feb; 9(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 9493938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid. de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]