These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8220281)

  • 41. [Early detection of hearing loss in neonates by using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Trinidad Ramos G; Pando Pinto J; Vega Cuadri A; Serrano Berrocal M; Trinidad Ruiz G; Blasco Huelva A
    An Esp Pediatr; 1999 Feb; 50(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 10199028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Audiological assessment of infants and children with preauricular tags.
    François M; Wiener-Vacher SR; Falala M; Narcy P
    Audiology; 1995; 34(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7487642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evolution of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in preterm newborns: a preliminary study.
    Eshraghi A; François M; Narcy P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1996 Oct; 37(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 8894810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Detection of hearing loss in young children and adults using otoacoustic emissions.
    Herer GR; Glattke TJ; Rafitis IA; Cummiskey C
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1996; 48(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8768362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey.
    Tasci Y; Muderris II; Erkaya S; Altinbas S; Yucel H; Haberal A
    Child Care Health Dev; 2010 May; 36(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 20015280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A universal newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Chang KC; Bruna SM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2002 May; 63(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 11997156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Otoacoustic emissions latency difference between full-term and preterm neonates.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Hatzopoulos S; Martini A; Blinowska KJ
    Hear Res; 2007 Sep; 231(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 17606343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period.
    Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Gorga MP; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Ekelid M; Norton SJ
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):383-99. PubMed ID: 11059700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A review of the effectiveness of otoacoustic emissions for evaluating hearing status after newborn screening.
    Janssen T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23628790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Clinical application of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in screening for auditory dysfunction].
    Fuse T; Aoyagi M; Suzuki T; Koike Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1993 Jul; 96(7):1125-32. PubMed ID: 8366407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Otoacoustic emission versus ABR screening: the effect of external and middle ear abnormalities in a group of SCBU neonates.
    El-Refaie A; Parker DJ; Bamford JM
    Br J Audiol; 1996 Feb; 30(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 8839361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of static middle ear pressure on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Plinkert PK; Bootz F; Vossieck T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1994; 251(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 8024768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of acoustic reflex and auditory brain stem response screening of high-risk infants.
    Hirsch JE; Margolis RH; Rykken JR
    Ear Hear; 1992 Jun; 13(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 1397758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.
    Prieve BA; Hancur-Bucci CA; Preston JL
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19322090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Wideband acoustic immittance for assessing middle ear functioning for preterm neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Gouws N; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2017 Jun; 64(1):e1-e11. PubMed ID: 28697607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Otoacoustic emissions and auditory assessment in infants at risk for early brain damage.
    Vatovec J; Velickovic Perat M; Smid L; Gros A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Apr; 58(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 11278022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Application of the distortion products register in newborns. Preliminary results].
    Morant A; Orts M; Ortells I; Marco Algarra J; Paredes C; Brines J
    An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1996; 23(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 9065239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging.
    Reeves MJ; Brandreth M; Whitby EH; Hart AR; Paley MN; Griffiths PD; Stevens JC
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 20876389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Preliminary assessment of transient evoked acoustic emissions (TEOAE) in newborns depending on selected parameters of delivery complications with particular analysis of newborns with hypotrophy].
    Morawski K; Dudkiewicz J; Bazowska G; Namysłowski G; Urbaniec N; Lisowska G; Oslislo A
    Ginekol Pol; 1998 Dec; 69(12):943-8. PubMed ID: 10224756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.