These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8220807)

  • 1. Decision making with pregnant patients: a policy born of experience.
    Mishkin DB; Povar GJ
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1993 Aug; 19(8):291-302. PubMed ID: 8220807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hospital sets policy on pregnant patients' rights.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():B14. PubMed ID: 11646791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In re A.C.
    Bourke LH
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2279918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissecting women, dissecting law: the court-ordering of caesarean section operations and the failure of informed consent to protect women of color.
    Espinoza LG
    Natl Black Law J; 1994; 13():211-37. PubMed ID: 11660478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In re A.C.
    District of Columbia. Court of Appeals, en banc
    Atl Report; 1990 Apr; 573():1235-64. PubMed ID: 11648191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care?
    Phelan JP
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity.
    Finer JJ
    Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pregnant woman vs. fetus: a dilemma for hospital ethics committees.
    Swartz M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 1342849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Courts acting to force care of the unborn.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the doctor know best--what is the scope for non-consensual treatment?
    Francis R
    Med Leg J; 1995; 63 ( Pt 1)():7-22; discussion 22-5. PubMed ID: 7739420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In Re A.C.--an affirmation of ACOG Committee Opinion Number 55: maternal-fetal conflict.
    Allen AE
    Womens Health Issues; 1990; 1(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 2136301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
    Tauer CA
    Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesareans and Samaritans.
    Rhoden NK
    Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 3695574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In re A.C.
    District of Columbia. Court of Appeals
    Atl Report; 1987 Nov; 533():611-7. PubMed ID: 11648174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
    Scott C
    Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 162(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 2309810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A structural analysis of the physician-patient relationship in no-code decisionmaking.
    Hashimoto DM
    Yale Law J; 1983 Dec; 93(2):362-83. PubMed ID: 11658880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.