These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8220807)

  • 21. Furthering the inquiry: race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Ikemoto LC
    Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):487-517. PubMed ID: 11652636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population.
    Miller TE; Coleman CH; Cugliari AM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Mar; 45(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 9063286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical ethics and ethics committees.
    Bartholome WG
    Bioethics Forum; 1994; 10(4):5-11. PubMed ID: 11652881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The emergence of maternal-fetal conflict policies.
    Neumann PG; Valladares L
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1991 Dec; 6(12):3-7. PubMed ID: 10183596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy.
    Mayo TW
    Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New medical technology: a chance to reexamine court-ordered medical procedures during pregnancy.
    Ouellette A
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):927-60. PubMed ID: 11652868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reflection on the physician's responsibility to mother and fetus.
    Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Biomedical Ethics Committee
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1993 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 11659577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Risk-benefit ratio: the soft underbelly of patient autonomy.
    Gunn AE
    Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):139-53. PubMed ID: 1938331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The burden of decision.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):36-41. PubMed ID: 2376496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maternal-fetal conflicts. Ethical and legal implications for nurse-midwives.
    King NM
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 1757822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument.
    Pellegrino ED; Walter JJ; Tauer CA
    Health Prog; 1992 Dec; 73(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Policy on decision making with pregnant patients at the George Washington University Hospital.
    Baptist Medical Center, et al
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 16100841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Women, forced caesareans and antenatal responsibilities.
    Draper H
    J Med Ethics; 1996 Dec; 22(6):327-33. PubMed ID: 8961116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Proxy consent for incompetent non-terminally ill adult patients.
    Solnick PB
    J Leg Med; 1985 Mar; 6(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 3889203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?
    Knopoff KA
    Calif Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 79(2):499-540. PubMed ID: 11659841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.