168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8221366)
21. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: a comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination.
Schiefer U; Flad M; Stumpp F; Malsam A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Denk PO; Sample PA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 121(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 12695242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with a blue stimulus on a dark background.
Wessels IF; Randhawa RS
Eye (Lond); 1996; 10 ( Pt 5)():620-5. PubMed ID: 8977793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating a visual field screening test for glaucoma: how the choice of the gold standard affects the validity of the test.
Ellish NJ; Higginbotham EJ
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 8(5):297-307. PubMed ID: 11922383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is oculokinetic perimetry useful?
Abreu Reyes JA; Gonzalez de la Rosa M; Sanchez Mendez M; Mesa Moreno CG; Santos Barrera R
Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):215-9. PubMed ID: 1428546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect using a screening program of Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Hong C; Song KY; Youn DH; Park WH
Korean J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 4(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2214247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice.
Graham SL; Klistorner AI; Goldberg I
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 123(6):729-39. PubMed ID: 15955974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Early detection of glaucoma by means of a novel 3D computer-automated visual field test.
Nazemi PP; Fink W; Sadun AA; Francis B; Minckler D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1331-6. PubMed ID: 17504855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
Bruun-Jensen J
Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma.
Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L
Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma.
Alvarez E; Damato BE; Jay JL; McClure E
Br J Ophthalmol; 1988 Apr; 72(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 3378021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Evaluation of the Friedmann visual field analyser in detecting glaucoma damage].
Xu LA
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 2507257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in glaucoma patients].
Kono Y; Maeda M; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 May; 97(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 8337971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
