These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8222599)

  • 21. Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections.
    Schulte AG; Wittchen A; Stachniss V; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18063865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of the validator and the validation method on the outcome of occlusal caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Verdonschot EH; Truin GJ; König KG
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 8001061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth.
    Hintze H; Wenze A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 9084258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing the accuracy of Dutch dentists and dental students in the radiographic diagnosis of dentinal caries.
    Mileman PA; van den Hout WB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 11803382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of wavelet and discrete cosine transform compression of digital radiographs on the detection of subtle proximal caries. ROC analysis.
    Schulze RK; Richter A; d'Hoedt B
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 18701823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Initial in vitro evaluation of DIAGNOdent for detecting secondary carious lesions associated with resin composite restorations.
    Boston DW
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 12666859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
    Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
    Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors involved in validity measurements of diagnostic tests for approximal caries--a meta-analysis.
    van Rijkom HM; Verdonschot EH
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 8521438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Grey-scale reversed radiographic display in the detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ
    J Dent; 2005 Jan; 33(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15652170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
    Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
    Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Author's reply to the Letter to the Editor entitled "Gold standard for the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic images for approximal caries detection" published in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009;38:245).
    Akarslan ZZ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):493; author reply 494. PubMed ID: 19767523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.