171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8222623)
1. Influence of irritants on lymph node cell proliferation and the detection of contact sensitivity to metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ikarashi Y; Tsukamoto Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Sep; 29(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 8222623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Cruse LW; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002 Nov; 40(11):1719-25. PubMed ID: 12176099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles.
Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A
Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of contact sensitivity of metal salts using the murine local lymph node assay.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicol Lett; 1992 Aug; 62(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 1509507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals.
Ulrich P; Streich J; Suter W
Arch Toxicol; 2001 Feb; 74(12):733-44. PubMed ID: 11305775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective modulation of B-cell activation markers CD86 and I-Ak on murine draining lymph node cells following allergen or irritant treatment.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Miller CM; Ridder GM
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1999 Sep; 159(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 10495778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA; Hulette BC; Chaney JG; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Toxicol Sci; 2002 Aug; 68(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 12151637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon-gamma and interleukin 12.
Dearman RJ; Hilton J; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 10362264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Arch Toxicol; 1993; 67(9):629-36. PubMed ID: 8311690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Local lymph node assay: study of the in vitro proliferation and control of the specificity of the response by FACScan analysis.
de Silva O; Perez MJ; Pineau N; Rougier A; Dossou KG
Toxicol In Vitro; 1993 Jul; 7(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 20732205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a flow cytometry assay for the identification and differentiation of chemicals with the potential to elicit irritation, IgE-mediated, or T cell-mediated hypersensitivity responses.
Manetz TS; Meade BJ
Toxicol Sci; 1999 Apr; 48(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 10353312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Improvement of local lymph node assay for cosmetics safety evaluation].
Liu Z; Liu J; Wang F; Xu G; Hou J; Wan X; Zhang T
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2009 Sep; 38(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 19877522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene expression profiles in auricle skin as a possible additional endpoint for determination of sensitizers: A multi-endpoint evaluation of the local lymph node assay.
Tsuchiyama H; Maeda A; Nakajima M; Kitsukawa M; Takahashi K; Miyoshi T; Mutsuga M; Asaoka Y; Miyamoto Y; Oshida K
Toxicol Lett; 2017 Oct; 280():133-141. PubMed ID: 28826779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An international evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Ladics GS; Loveless SE; House RV
Toxicology; 1995 Nov; 103(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 8525491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of lymphocyte proliferation by immunohistochemistry in the local lymph node assay.
Boussiquet-Leroux C; Durand-Cavagna G; Herlin K; Holder D
J Appl Toxicol; 1995; 15(6):465-75. PubMed ID: 8603934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in lymph nodes draining the ear following exposure to contact allergens and irritants.
Sikorski EE; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Miller CM; Ridder GM
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1996 Nov; 34(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 8937889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selective induction of type 2 cytokines following topical exposure of mice to platinum salts.
Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 9609393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
