These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8223971)

  • 1. Early treatment of Class III incisor relationship using the chincap appliance.
    Allen RA; Connolly IH; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Oct; 15(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 8223971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term effect of the chincap on hard and soft tissues.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 21(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 10407538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.
    Owens D; Watkinson S; Harrison JE; Turner S; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 Apr; 4(4):CD003451. PubMed ID: 38597341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Class III malocclusion: the post-retention findings following a non-extraction treatment approach.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 15(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 8436196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Stabilized position of incisors after orthodontic treatment on reversed occlusion cases with skeletal imbalance. Application of quadrilateral analysis].
    Morita S; Ishii H; Egami K; Ogura H; Kasai K; Seki H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 48(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 2637321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan PW; Hagg U; Yiu C; Wei SH
    Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 9573887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.
    Watkinson S; Harrison JE; Furness S; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; (9):CD003451. PubMed ID: 24085611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term evaluation after chincap treatment.
    Uner O; Yüksel S; Uçüncü N
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 7781722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in postural class III malocclusion treated with a maxillary removable appliance.
    Alhaija ES
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 17315814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incremental effects of facemask therapy associated with intermaxillary mechanics.
    Thiesen G; Fontes Jde O; Zastrow MD; May NB
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 20575205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study.
    Cura N; Sarac M; Oztürk Y; Sürmeli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jul; 110(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 8686676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.