These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8223973)

  • 21. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):375-88. PubMed ID: 9753819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dentoskeletal effects and "effective" temporomandibular joint, maxilla and chin changes in good and bad responders to van Beek activator treatment.
    Ruf S; Bendeus M; Pancherz H; Hägg U
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 17029547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Position changes of mandibular condyle in Herbst treatment. Radiographic study].
    Pancherz H; Stickel A
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1989; 21(4):515-27. PubMed ID: 2636216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.
    LeCornu M; Cevidanes LH; Zhu H; Wu CD; Larson B; Nguyen T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):818-30. PubMed ID: 24286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional positional assessment of glenoid fossae and mandibular condyles in patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion.
    de Mattos JM; Palomo JM; de Oliveira Ruellas AC; Cheib PL; Eliliwi M; Souki BQ
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Nov; 87(6):847-854. PubMed ID: 28862492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment.
    Serbesis-Tsarudis C; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the disc-condyle relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part II).
    Kinzinger GS; Roth A; Gülden N; Bücker A; Diedrich PR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 16940483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Class II, Division 1, with strong vertical growth tendencies treated non extraction and no displacement of condyles.
    McCarthy MF; Meyers CE; Harrison P
    Orthod Rev; 1991; 5(2):22-31. PubMed ID: 1813848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A cone-beam CT investigation on the effect of two-phase treatment and fixed appliance treatment only on temporomandibular joint].
    Chen WW; Sang T; Huang Z; Wu J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):410-4. PubMed ID: 27480431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporomandibular joint effects of activator treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical study.
    Ruf S; Wüsten B; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):527-40. PubMed ID: 12518944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of functional treatment on the sagittal position of the mandibular condyle.
    Ozdiler E; Akçam MO
    J Oral Sci; 2000 Dec; 42(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 11269377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The functional shift of the mandible in unilateral posterior crossbite and the adaptation of the temporomandibular joints: a pilot study.
    Nerder PH; Bakke M; Solow B
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 10327739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in the TMJ disc-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Arat ZM; Gökalp H; Erdem D; Erden I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 11244427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Baltromejus S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Feb; 71(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11211297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Morphologic adaptation of temporomandibular joint after chincup therapy.
    Mimura H; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Nov; 110(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 8922514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The value of Schüller's temporomandibular joint radiography for the diagnosis of joint related malocclusion].
    Kundert M
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1976 Apr; 86(4):393-412. PubMed ID: 1063441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prospective study of posttreatment changes in the temporomandibular joint.
    Carlton KL; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 12439476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The temporomandibular joint and the disc-condyle relationship after functional orthopaedic treatment: a magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Watted N; Witt E; Kenn W
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Dec; 23(6):683-93. PubMed ID: 11890064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class I malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.
    Rodrigues AF; Fraga MR; Vitral RW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 19651348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.