These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8224946)

  • 1. Evaluation of FASTPAC: a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Flanagan JG; Moss ID; Wild JM; Hudson C; Prokopich L; Whitaker D; O'Neill EC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 231(8):465-9. PubMed ID: 8224946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Trope GE
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Jun; 100(6):949-54. PubMed ID: 8510911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Static threshold visual field in glaucoma with the Fastpac algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Is the gain in examination time offset by any loss of information?
    Nordmann JP; Denis P; Nguer Y; Mouton-Chopin D; Saraux H
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1994; 4(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 7950333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between Fastpac and conventional Humphrey perimetry.
    Young IM; Rait JL; Guest CS; Carson CA; Taylor HR
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1994 May; 22(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 7917272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does saving time using FASTPAC or suprathreshold testing reduce quality of visual fields?
    Mills RP; Barnebey HS; Migliazzo CV; Li Y
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Sep; 101(9):1596-603. PubMed ID: 8090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fastpac visual field screening.
    Young IM; Rait JL; Carson CA; Taylor HR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 2(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8963914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Jun; 76(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 9686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.
    O'Brien C; Poinoosawmy D; Wu J; Hitchings R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 78(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 7918261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Glass E; Schaumberger M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 36(9):1847-54. PubMed ID: 7635658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A; Olsson J
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Apr; 76(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 9591946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; Hancock SA; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1152-61. PubMed ID: 10235548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 87(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 12488273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Aug; 76(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 9716329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Bengtsson B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Apr; 77(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 10321523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.