168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8225465)
1. Occlusal force and mandibular movements in patients with removable overdentures and fixed prostheses supported by implants in the maxilla.
Jemt T; Book K; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 8225465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Provisional implants for anchoring removable interim prostheses in edentulous jaws: a clinical study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Schmidinger S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 12939013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study.
Jemt T; Carlsson L; Boss A; Jörneús L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 1820310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Feine JS; Maskawi K; de Grandmont P; Donohue WB; Tanguay R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1646-56. PubMed ID: 7929979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment.
Ohkubo C; Kobayashi M; Suzuki Y; Hosoi T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19216279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; Quirynen M
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 15382775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare.
Visser A; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 19418867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures.
Mericske-Stern R; Geering AH; Burgin WB; Graf H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 1398835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a 'planned' maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses.
Sanna A; Nuytens P; Naert I; Quirynen M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 19298295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system.
Romeo E; Lops D; Margutti E; Ghisolfi M; Chiapasco M; Vogel G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):247-59. PubMed ID: 15101597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8-year experience in private practice.
Nedir R; Bischof M; Szmukler-Moncler S; Belser UC; Samson J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):919-28. PubMed ID: 17190302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of maxillary overdentures supported by implants: maintenance and prosthetic complications.
Kiener P; Oetterli M; Mericske E; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 11843449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
