266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8225862)
21. The motion sensitivity screening test in clinical practice in abuja, Nigeria: affordable automated perimetry for the third world?
Babalola OE
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Jun; 34(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 16749334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons.
Kerrigan-Baumrind LA; Quigley HA; Pease ME; Kerrigan DF; Mitchell RS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 10711689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
Johnson CA; Samuels SJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The relationship between optic disc area and open-angle glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey.
Quigley HA; Varma R; Tielsch JM; Katz J; Sommer A; Gilbert DL
J Glaucoma; 1999 Dec; 8(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 10604292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma.
Parikh RS; Parikh S; Sekhar GC; Kumar RS; Prabakaran S; Babu JG; Thomas R
Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2238-43. PubMed ID: 17561260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
Jonas JB; Bergua A; Schmitz-Valckenberg P; Papastathopoulos KI; Budde WM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1764-73. PubMed ID: 10845597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlation between intraocular pressure level and optic disc changes in high-tension glaucoma suspects.
Tanito M; Itai N; Dong J; Ohira A; Chihara E
Ophthalmology; 2003 May; 110(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 12750089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the oculo-kinetic perimetry glaucoma screening test in a sub-Saharan African setting.
Mahmoud AO; Omalase CO; Ekundayo K
West Afr J Med; 2008 Jul; 27(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 19256315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network.
Goldbaum MH; Sample PA; White H; Côlt B; Raphaelian P; Fechtner RD; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Aug; 35(9):3362-73. PubMed ID: 8056511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
Vernon SA; Quigley HA
Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
Bruun-Jensen J
Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Damato campimetry and Humphrey automated perimetry results in a clinical population.
Rowe FJ; Sueke H; Gawley SD
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 94(6):757-62. PubMed ID: 20447958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.
Vernon SA; Quigley HA
Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 4)():406-9. PubMed ID: 7821461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL
Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
