112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8227574)
1. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Schlegel A; Beck R; Wendt T; Kellner W; Lommatzsch B; Untch M; Nathrath WB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(6):891-900. PubMed ID: 8227574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy.
Viehweg P; Heinig A; Lampe D; Buchmann J; Heywang-Köbrunner SH
MAGMA; 1998 Dec; 7(3):141-52. PubMed ID: 10050940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH
Invest Radiol; 1994 Jan; 29(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 8144345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Whitehouse GH; Moore NR
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 7489311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations.
Cohen EK; Leonhardt CM; Shumak RS; Soutar IC; Bukhanov K; Fishell EK; Plewes DB
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8640412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma.
Rieber A; Merkle E; Zeitler H; Görich J; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):780-4. PubMed ID: 9294575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Contrast medium assisted dynamic MR-mammography after diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the breast].
Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Kopka L; Kahlen O; Grabbe E
Bildgebung; 1996 Jun; 63(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 8756151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic sequential 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the whole breast.
Heiberg EV; Perman WH; Herrmann VM; Janney CG
Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 14(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 8782170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laser therapy for breast cancer: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation.
Mumtaz H; Hall-Craggs MA; Wotherspoon A; Paley M; Buonaccorsi G; Amin Z; Wilkinson I; Kissin MW; Davidson TI; Taylor I; Bown SG
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):651-8. PubMed ID: 8756910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast.
Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy with MRI.
Muüller RD; Barkhausen J; Sauerwein W; Langer R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):408-12. PubMed ID: 9606381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The indeterminate breast mass: assessment using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Hickman PF; Moore NR; Shepstone BJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):14-20. PubMed ID: 8298869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.
Boetes C; Barentsz JO; Mus RD; van der Sluis RF; van Erning LJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Ruys SH
Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 7972823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quantitative assessment of therapy related effects after breast conserving therapy with dynamic MRI of the breast].
Wersebe A; Xydeas T; Clauss T; Dietz K; Belka C; Fersis N; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2001 Dec; 173(12):1109-17. PubMed ID: 11740672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
Buadu LD; Murakami J; Murayama S; Hashiguchi N; Sakai S; Masuda K; Toyoshima S; Kuroki S; Ohno S
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 8756909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [MR imaging for breast cancer].
Seki T; Hachiya J; Nitatori T; Yokoyama K; Fukushima H; Uchigasaki S
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 97(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 8709936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography of both breasts following local excision and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma.
Murray AD; Redpath TW; Needham G; Gilbert FJ; Brookes JA; Eremin O
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):594-600. PubMed ID: 8696694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat suppressed magnetic resonance imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience.
Kerslake RW; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Bowsley SJ; Horsman A
Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1158-68. PubMed ID: 7874413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benign versus malignant breast disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintimammography.
Fenlon HM; Phelan NC; O'Sullivan P; Tierney S; Gorey T; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9314988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
