These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8227692)

  • 1. Surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP
    J Dent; 1993 Oct; 21(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 8227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of salivary films on the surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8180615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study to determine the wettability and castability of different elastomeric impression materials.
    Reddy GV; Reddy NS; Itttigi J; Jagadeesh KN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 May; 13(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 22918010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of plasma treatment on the wettability of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP; Nilner K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 8371180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wettability of elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts.
    Cullen DR; Mikesell JW; Sandrik JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 1774689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between contact angles of die stone on elastomeric impression materials and voids in stone casts.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Setchell DJ; Wickens JL
    Dent Mater; 1990 Jul; 6(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 2086288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface properties and castability of elastomeric impression materials after plasma cleaning.
    Fernandes CP; Vassilakos N; Nilner K
    Dent Mater; 1992 Nov; 8(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 1303381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface porosity of stone casts resulting from immersion of addition silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
    Hiraguchi H; Kaketani M; Hirose H; Kikuchi H; Yoneyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 25390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy, detail reproduction, and hardness of gypsum casts produced from silicone impressions treated with glow discharge.
    Fernandes CP; Vassilakos N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Nov; 70(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 8254551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detail reproduction of soft tissue: a comparison of impression materials.
    Pratten DH; Novetsky M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 2051353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear dimensional changes in plaster die models using different elastomeric materials.
    Pereira JR; Murata KY; Valle AL; Ghizoni JS; Shiratori FK
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 20877972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Setting expansion of dental stone in hydrophilic addition type silicone impression].
    Kakuta K; Ogura H; Miyagawa Y; Kashiwagi Y
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Sep; 8(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 2490217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials.
    Butta R; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Moles DR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 15942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Elastomeric impression materials].
    Levartovsky S; Folkman M; Alter E; Pilo R
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2011 Apr; 28(2):54-64, 75. PubMed ID: 21848031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials.
    Adabo GL; Zanarotti E; Fonseca RG; Cruz CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):621-4. PubMed ID: 10220669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.