These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8227706)

  • 1. Distributed crack analysis of ceramic inlays.
    Peters MC; de Vree JH; Brekelmans WA
    J Dent Res; 1993 Nov; 72(11):1537-42. PubMed ID: 8227706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture behavior of inlay and onlay fixed partial dentures - An in-vitro experimental and XFEM modeling study.
    Zhang Z; Thompson M; Field C; Li W; Li Q; Swain MV
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():279-290. PubMed ID: 26894661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ceramic inlays: is the inlay thickness an important factor influencing the fracture risk?
    Holberg C; Rudzki-Janson I; Wichelhaus A; Winterhalder P
    J Dent; 2013 Jul; 41(7):628-35. PubMed ID: 23639702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture risk of lithium-disilicate ceramic inlays: a finite element analysis.
    Holberg C; Winterhalder P; Wichelhaus A; Hickel R; Huth K
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1244-50. PubMed ID: 24119917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of interface surface conditions on indentation failure of simulated bonded ceramic onlays.
    Clelland NL; Warchol N; Kerby RE; Katsube N; Seghi RR
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 16081154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture mechanics analyses of ceramic/veneer interface under mixed-mode loading.
    Wang G; Zhang S; Bian C; Kong H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():119-28. PubMed ID: 25123435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC; Lee RB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigations of subcritical crack propagation of the Empress 2 all-ceramic system.
    Mitov G; Lohbauer U; Rabbo MA; Petschelt A; Pospiech P
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 17631955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature.
    Boushell LW; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of tooth mobility on critical stresses in all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses: a finite element study.
    Möllers K; Parkot D; Kirsten A; Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Fischer H
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 22104732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
    Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration.
    Liu X; Fok A; Li H
    Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24424091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.