These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8227741)

  • 1. Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels.
    Zahorian SA; Jagharghi AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):1966-82. PubMed ID: 8227741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of formant-like features on an automatic vowel classification task.
    de Wet F; Weber K; Boves L; Cranen B; Bengio S; Bourlard H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15478445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels.
    Syrdal AK; Gopal HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1086-100. PubMed ID: 3700864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of steady-state vowels synthesized from the Peterson and Barney measurements.
    Hillenbrand J; Gayvert RT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):668-74. PubMed ID: 8370872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speaker normalization of static and dynamic vowel spectral features.
    Zahorian SA; Jagharghi AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 1880302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Static features in real-time recognition of isolated vowels at high pitch.
    Ferreira AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2389-404. PubMed ID: 17902873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15807027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination.
    Kewley-Port D; Li X; Zheng Y; Neel AT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2462-70. PubMed ID: 8865651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels and vowels in /bVb/ syllables.
    Andruski JE; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):390-410. PubMed ID: 1737887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels.
    Leung KK; Jongman A; Wang Y; Sereno JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):45. PubMed ID: 27475131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural representation of vowel formants in tonotopic auditory cortex.
    Fisher JM; Dick FK; Levy DF; Wilson SM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():574-582. PubMed ID: 29860083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vowel-specific effects in concurrent vowel identification.
    de Cheveigné A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):327-40. PubMed ID: 10420625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of vowel height: the role of F1-F0 distance.
    Hoemeke KA; Diehl RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):661-74. PubMed ID: 7930066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual confusions of high-pitched sung vowels.
    Hollien H; Mendes-Schwartz AP; Nielsen K
    J Voice; 2000 Jun; 14(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 10875582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distance vs time. Acoustic and articulatory consequences of reduced vowel duration in Polish.
    Strycharczuk P; Ćavar M; Coretta S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jul; 150(1):592. PubMed ID: 34340503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vowel-internal cues to vowel quality and prominence in speech perception.
    Steffman J
    Phonetica; 2023 Oct; 80(5):329-356. PubMed ID: 37650429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal--nasal distinction for vowels.
    Hawkins S; Stevens KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1560-75. PubMed ID: 3989111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.