These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8227746)

  • 1. A comparison of speech discrimination with cochlear implants and tactile aids.
    Carney AE; Osberger MJ; Carney E; Robbins AM; Renshaw J; Miyamoto RT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2036-49. PubMed ID: 8227746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Maso M; Sam LK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):186-203. PubMed ID: 8450658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Miyamoto RT; Berry SW; Myres WA; Kessler KS; Pope ML
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():105-15. PubMed ID: 2069171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory Discrimination of Lexical Stress Patterns in Hearing-Impaired Infants with Cochlear Implants Compared with Normal Hearing: Influence of Acoustic Cues and Listening Experience to the Ambient Language.
    Segal O; Houston D; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26627470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.
    Miyamoto RT; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Riley AI; Kirk KI
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8579182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural cochlear implants.
    Green JD; Mills DM; Bell BA; Luxford WM; Tonokawa LL
    Am J Otol; 1992 Nov; 13(6):502-6. PubMed ID: 1449175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: a comparison with a single-channel tactile device.
    Carney AE; Kienle M; Miyamoto RT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2141660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of vowel production by children with multichannel cochlear implants or tactile aids: perceptual evidence.
    Ertmer DJ; Kirk KI; Sehgal ST; Riley AI; Osberger MJ
    Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 9288476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the spontaneous speech samples of children with cochlear implants or tactile aids.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Berry SW; Todd SL; Hesketh LJ; Sedey A
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():151-64. PubMed ID: 2069176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluations of 3M/House single-channel and nucleus multichannel cochlear implants.
    Cunningham JK; Stoeckert JA
    Am J Otol; 1992 Sep; 13(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 1443081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients.
    Busby PA; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):1058-67. PubMed ID: 8445117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory perception changes after reimplantation in a child cochlear implant user.
    Chute PM; Hellman SA; Parisier SC; Tartter VC; Economou A
    Ear Hear; 1992 Jun; 13(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 1397760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of sensory aids in deaf children.
    Miyamoto RT; Osberger MJ; Robbins AJ; Renshaw J; Myres WA; Kessler K; Pope ML
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1989 Aug; 142():2-7. PubMed ID: 2504097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of outcomes in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Olds J; Gaboury I; McCrae R; Schramm D; Durieux-Smith A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 22340747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.