These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8227747)

  • 21. Simulation of sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Gagné JP; Erber NP
    Ear Hear; 1987 Aug; 8(4):232-43. PubMed ID: 3653537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
    Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
    Vickers DA; Moore BC; Baer T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1164-75. PubMed ID: 11519583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Oct; 32(5):317-35. PubMed ID: 9845030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: recruitment reconsidered.
    Buus S; Florentine M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):120-39. PubMed ID: 12162363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Braida LD; Durlach NI; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2575-86. PubMed ID: 8270735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.
    Johnson EE
    Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):143-70. PubMed ID: 24253361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A compact disc containing simulations of hearing impairment.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Oct; 31(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 9373744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired.
    Sammeth CA; Birman M; Hecox KE
    Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2707507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.
    Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):575-86. PubMed ID: 8747807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution.
    Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 1783226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Skinner MW; Miller JD
    Audiology; 1983; 22(3):253-79. PubMed ID: 6870667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring the long-term SNRs of static and adaptive compression amplification techniques for speech in noise.
    Lai YH; Li PC; Tsai KS; Chu WC; Young ST
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):671-83. PubMed ID: 24131603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.