127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8227867)
1. Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.
Nelson HS; Rosloniec DM; McCall LI; Iklé D
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Nov; 92(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 8227867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two disposable plastic skin test devices with the bifurcated needle for epicutaneous allergy testing.
Corder WT; Hogan MB; Wilson NW
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Sep; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 8814048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative study of 3 types of lancets for performing prick tests].
Montalvo A; Martín S; Mesa A; Cortés C; Rodríguez M; Laso MT
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1996; 24(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 8992889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of skin prick test results in epidemiologic studies: a comparison of two devices.
Illi S; Garcia-Marcos L; Hernando V; Guillen JJ; Liese A; von Mutius E
Allergy; 1998 Apr; 53(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 9574876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance and Pain Tolerability of Current Diagnostic Allergy Skin Prick Test Devices.
Tversky JR; Chelladurai Y; McGready J; Hamilton RG
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(6):888-93. PubMed ID: 26553615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
Adinoff AD; Rosloniec DM; McCall LL; Nelson HS
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Aug; 84(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 2760359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.
Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and ComforTen allergy skin test devices.
Dykewicz MS; Dooms KT; Chassaing DL
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2011; 32(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 21703099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a new lancet and a hypodermic needle for skin prick testing.
Dirksen A; Mosbech H; Søborg M; Biering I
Allergy; 1983 Jul; 38(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 6614408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three methods of using the DermaPIK with the standard prick method for epicutaneous skin testing.
Corder WT; Wilson NW
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Nov; 75(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 7583866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pain perception and performance of three devices for single-site allergen skin testing.
Nelson HS; Lopez P; Curran-Everett D
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2014; 35(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 24433598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Multi-Test device for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
Berkowitz RB; Tinkelman DG; Lutz C; Crummie A; Smith K
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Dec; 90(6 Pt 1):979-85. PubMed ID: 1460201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of two lancets in the skin prick test].
Castro Almarales RL; Primo Valdés SI; González León M; Navarro Viltre BI; Alvarez Castañeda M; Irarragorri Toledo C; Ronquillo Díaz M; García Gómez I; Labrada Rosado A
Rev Alerg Mex; 2005; 52(5):188-93. PubMed ID: 16579181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histamine control affects the weal produced by the adjacent diluent control in skin prick tests.
Terho EO; Husman K; Kivekäs J; Riihimäki H
Allergy; 1989 Jan; 44(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 2719175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device.
Lin RY; Erlich ER; Don PC
Ann Allergy; 1990 Sep; 65(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2403228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and Skintestor Omni allergy skin test devices.
Dykewicz MS; Lemmon JK; Keaney DL
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 17601269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.
Sangsupawanich P; Chamnanphol S; Koonrungsrisomboon D
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2000 Sep; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11270470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Quintest to the lancet in allergic skin testing.
Carrozzi FM; Byth K; Katelaris CH
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 1998 Dec; 16(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 10219895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
