BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8228433)

  • 1. Skeletofacial changes by mandibular advancement using sagittal split osteotomies.
    Gomes MA; Wisth PJ; Tornes K; Bøe OE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 8228433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mechanism of Class II correction in surgical orthodontic treatment of adult Class II, division 1 malocclusions.
    Pancherz H; Ruf S; Erbe C; Hansen K
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):800-9. PubMed ID: 15673144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D; Ferri J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
    Thüer U; Ingervall B; Vuillemin T
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of condylar positional changes after sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement: A prospective cohort study.
    Costas A; Sanromán JF; Castro P; Ferro MF; Lopez A; Stavaru B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 46(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 29773499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
    Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior vertical deficiencies of the mandible: presentation of a new corrective technique and retrospective study of 21 cases.
    Ferri J; Ricard D; Genay A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 66(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 18083413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in the dimensions of milled mandibular models after mandibular sagittal split osteotomies.
    Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Jun; 36(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 9678885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anterior skeletal fixation as an adjunct to oblique sliding osteotomy of the mandibular ramus. A cephalometric study.
    Ahlén K; Rosenquist J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1990 May; 18(4):147-50. PubMed ID: 2358502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability after rigid fixation of simultaneous maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement osteotomies.
    Emshoff R; Scheiderbauer A; Gerhard S; Norer B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 32(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 12729772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occlusal plane rotation: aesthetic enhancement in mandibular micrognathia.
    Rosen HM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Jun; 91(7):1231-40; discussion 1241-4. PubMed ID: 8497522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of mandibular stability after sagittal split osteotomies: biocortical versus monocortical osteosynthesis.
    Fujioka M; Fujii T; Hirano A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 11108524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal stability following miniplate fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
    Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Neyt L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 51(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 8450352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nature of relapse after surgical mandibular advancement.
    Bhatia SN; Yan B; Behbehani I; Harris M
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Apr; 12(2):58-69. PubMed ID: 3859327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy.
    Gjørup H; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 1927981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lag screw versus position screw techniques for rigid internal fixation of sagittal osteotomies: a comparison of stability.
    Watzke IM; Tucker MR; Turvey TA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 1940536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sagittal split advancement osteotomy: comparison of the tendency to relapse after two different methods of rigid fixation.
    Kahnberg KE; Kashani H; Owman-Moll P
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2007; 41(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 17701729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.