128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8228721)
1. Automated measurement of QT interval dispersion from hard-copy ECGs.
Bhullar HK; Fothergill JC; Goddard WP; de Bono DP
J Electrocardiol; 1993 Oct; 26(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 8228721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring QT dispersion: man versus machine.
Murray A; McLaughlin NB; Campbell RW
Heart; 1997 Jun; 77(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 9227298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agreement and reproducibility of automatic versus manual measurement of QT interval and QT dispersion.
Savelieva I; Yi G; Guo X; Hnatkova K; Malik M
Am J Cardiol; 1998 Feb; 81(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 9485139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of reproducibility--automated and digital caliper ECG measurement in the Framingham Heart Study.
Burke GM; Wang N; Blease S; Levy D; Magnani JW
J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 24792985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative reproducibility of QT, QT peak, and T peak-T end intervals and dispersion in normal subjects, patients with myocardial infarction, and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Savelieva I; Yap YG; Yi G; Guo X; Camm AJ; Malik M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2376-81. PubMed ID: 9825351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetocardiographic QT interval dispersion in postmyocardial infarction patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia: validation of automated QT measurements.
Oikarinen L; Paavola M; Montonen J; Viitasalo M; Mäkijärvi M; Toivonen L; Katila T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Oct; 21(10):1934-42. PubMed ID: 9793090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QT dispersion, T-wave projection, and heterogeneity of repolarization in patients with coronary artery disease.
Lee KW; Kligfield P; Dower GE; Okin PM
Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jan; 87(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 11152829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility and automatic measurement of QT dispersion.
Glancy JM; Weston PJ; Bhullar HK; Garratt CJ; Woods KL; de Bono DP
Eur Heart J; 1996 Jul; 17(7):1035-9. PubMed ID: 8809521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of popular automatic QT interval algorithms assessed by a 'gold standard' and comparison with a Novel method: computer simulation study.
Hunt AC
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2005 Sep; 5():29. PubMed ID: 16185361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of automated interval measurements by widely used algorithms in digital electrocardiographs.
Kligfield P; Badilini F; Denjoy I; Babaeizadeh S; Clark E; De Bie J; Devine B; Extramiana F; Generali G; Gregg R; Helfenbein E; Kors J; Leber R; Macfarlane P; Maison-Blanche P; Rowlandson I; Schmid R; Vaglio M; van Herpen G; Xue J; Young B; Green CL
Am Heart J; 2018 Jun; 200():1-10. PubMed ID: 29898835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QT dispersion and RR variations on 12-lead ECGs in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Fei L; Goldman JH; Prasad K; Keeling PJ; Reardon K; Camm AJ; McKenna WJ
Eur Heart J; 1996 Feb; 17(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 8732380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The development and validation of an easy to use automatic QT-interval algorithm.
Hermans BJM; Vink AS; Bennis FC; Filippini LH; Meijborg VMF; Wilde AAM; Pison L; Postema PG; Delhaas T
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184352. PubMed ID: 28863167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognosis in myocardial infarction survivors with left ventricular dysfunction is predicted by electrocardiographic RR interval but not QT dispersion.
Pedretti RF; Catalano O; Ballardini L; de Bono DP; Radice E; Tramarin R
Int J Cardiol; 1999 Jan; 68(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 10077405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic measurement of corrected QT interval in Holter recordings: comparison of its dynamic behavior in patients after myocardial infarction with and without life-threatening arrhythmias.
Homs E; Martí V; offndo J; Laguna P; Viñolas X; Caminal P; Elosua R; Bayés de Luna A
Am Heart J; 1997 Aug; 134(2 Pt 1):181-7. PubMed ID: 9313595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias of QT dispersion.
Lund K; Arildsen H; Perkiömäki JS; Huikuri HV; May O; Pedersen AK
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2001 Jan; 6(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11174861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An analysis of the electrocardiogram QT interval.
Koehler NR; Zouvi JP; Acevedo LA; Sukienik BJ; Rabin M
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2004 Jan; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 14689040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of automated measurements of electrocardiographic intervals and durations by computer-based algorithms of digital electrocardiographs.
Kligfield P; Badilini F; Rowlandson I; Xue J; Clark E; Devine B; Macfarlane P; de Bie J; Mortara D; Babaeizadeh S; Gregg R; Helfenbein ED; Green CL
Am Heart J; 2014 Feb; 167(2):150-159.e1. PubMed ID: 24439975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer analysis of monophasic action potentials: manual validation and clinically pertinent applications.
Franz MR; Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Zabel M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 18(9 Pt 1):1666-78. PubMed ID: 7491310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adjustment of QT dispersion assessed from 12 lead electrocardiograms for different numbers of analysed electrocardiographic leads: comparison of stability of different methods.
Hnatkova K; Malik M; Kautzner J; Gang Y; Camm AJ
Br Heart J; 1994 Oct; 72(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 7833200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences between QT and RR intervals in digital and digitized paper electrocardiograms: contribution of the printer, scanner, and digitization process.
Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Deshmukh S; Kothari S; Narula D
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 18482732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
