These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8228759)

  • 1. Video display terminal use during pregnancy and reproductive outcome--a meta-analysis.
    Parazzini F; Luchini L; La Vecchia C; Crosignani PG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1993 Aug; 47(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 8228759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exposure to video display terminals and risk of spontaneous abortion.
    Grasso P; Parazzini F; Chatenoud L; Di Cintio E; Benzi G
    Am J Ind Med; 1997 Oct; 32(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 9258394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidemiological studies of work with video display terminals and adverse pregnancy outcomes (1984-1992).
    Delpizzo V
    Am J Ind Med; 1994 Oct; 26(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 7810545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and pregnancy outcome: a review of the literature with particular attention to exposure to video terminals].
    Luchini L; Parazzini F
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1992; 113(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 1299152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Video display terminals and the risk of spontaneous abortion.
    Schnorr TM; Grajewski BA; Hornung RW; Thun MJ; Egeland GM; Murray WE; Conover DL; Halperin WE
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Mar; 324(11):727-33. PubMed ID: 1997838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse human reproductive outcomes and electromagnetic fields: a brief summary of the epidemiologic literature.
    Shaw GM
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2001; Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 11170114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic fields of video display terminals and spontaneous abortion.
    Lindbohm ML; Hietanen M; Kyyrönen P; Sallmén M; von Nandelstadh P; Taskinen H; Pekkarinen M; Ylikoski M; Hemminki K
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Nov; 136(9):1041-51. PubMed ID: 1462964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Work with video display terminals and the risk of reduced birthweight and preterm birth.
    Grajewski B; Schnorr TM; Reefhuis J; Roeleveld N; Salvan A; Mueller CA; Conover DL; Murray WE
    Am J Ind Med; 1997 Dec; 32(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 9358927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spontaneous abortion among women using video display terminals.
    Nielsen CV; Brandt LP
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1990 Oct; 16(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 2255872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of video display terminals during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion, low birthweight, or intrauterine growth retardation.
    Windham GC; Fenster L; Swan SH; Neutra RR
    Am J Ind Med; 1990; 18(6):675-88. PubMed ID: 2264566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Video display terminals and miscarriage.
    Marcus M; McChesney R; Golden A; Landrigan P
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2000; 55(2):84-8, 105. PubMed ID: 10808658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic fields of video display terminals and pregnancy outcome.
    Lindbohm ML; Hietanen M
    J Occup Environ Med; 1995 Aug; 37(8):952-6. PubMed ID: 8520959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational exposures and adverse pregnancy outcomes among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Quansah R; Jaakkola JJ
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2010 Oct; 19(10):1851-62. PubMed ID: 20809857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The risk of miscarriage and birth defects among women who use visual display terminals during pregnancy.
    Goldhaber MK; Polen MR; Hiatt RA
    Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 3389364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electromagnetic poles and reproduction].
    Indulski JA; Makowiec-Dabrowska T; Zmyślony M; Siedlecka J
    Med Pr; 1997; 48(5):585-603. PubMed ID: 9501341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of ultrasound, shortwaves, and physical exertion on pregnancy outcome in physiotherapists.
    Taskinen H; Kyyrönen P; Hemminki K
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1990 Sep; 44(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 2273355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal growth, preterm birth and infant mortality in relation to work with video display terminals during pregnancy.
    Nielsen CV; Brandt LP
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1992 Dec; 18(6):346-50. PubMed ID: 1485159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Video display terminal very low frequency measurements: the need for protocols in assessing VDT user "dose".
    Haes DL; Fitzgerald MR
    Health Phys; 1995 Apr; 68(4):572-8. PubMed ID: 7883571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re: "Magnetic fields of video display terminals and spontaneous abortion".
    Schnorr TM; Grajewski BA; Murray WE; Hornung RW
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(10):902; author reply 903-5. PubMed ID: 8305042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No evidence for an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome after paternal low-dose methotrexate: an observational cohort study.
    Weber-Schoendorfer C; Hoeltzenbein M; Wacker E; Meister R; Schaefer C
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2014 Apr; 53(4):757-63. PubMed ID: 24369411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.