These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8229111)

  • 1. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs--II. An original model for validation of drug causality assessment methods: case reports with positive rechallenge.
    Benichou C; Danan G; Flahault A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 46(11):1331-6. PubMed ID: 8229111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs--I. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: application to drug-induced liver injuries.
    Danan G; Benichou C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 46(11):1323-30. PubMed ID: 8229110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary Results of a Novel Algorithmic Method Aiming to Support Initial Causality Assessment of Routine Pharmacovigilance Case Reports for Medication-Induced Liver Injury: The PV-RUCAM.
    Scalfaro E; Streefkerk HJ; Merz M; Meier C; Lewis D
    Drug Saf; 2017 Aug; 40(8):715-727. PubMed ID: 28508325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) to analyze the hepatic findings in a clinical trial program: evaluation of the direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran.
    Lewis JH; Larrey D; Olsson R; Lee WM; Frison L; Keisu M
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Jul; 46(7):327-39. PubMed ID: 18793587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Drug Induced Liver Injury: Can Biomarkers Assist RUCAM in Causality Assessment?
    Teschke R; Schulze J; Eickhoff A; Danan G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Apr; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 28398242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Why is the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) Still Used 25 Years After Its Launch?
    Danan G; Teschke R
    Drug Saf; 2018 Aug; 41(8):735-743. PubMed ID: 29502198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method for assessing causality in drug-induced liver injury.
    Rochon J; Protiva P; Seeff LB; Fontana RJ; Liangpunsakul S; Watkins PB; Davern T; McHutchison JG;
    Hepatology; 2008 Oct; 48(4):1175-83. PubMed ID: 18798340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reproducibility of two scales in causality assessment of unexpected hepatotoxicity.
    Miljkovic MM; Dobric S; Dragojevic-Simic V
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2012 Apr; 37(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 21718339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells for causality assessment of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.
    Benesic A; Leitl A; Gerbes AL
    Gut; 2016 Sep; 65(9):1555-63. PubMed ID: 26045135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of naranjo adverse drug reactions probability scale in causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury.
    García-Cortés M; Lucena MI; Pachkoria K; Borraz Y; Hidalgo R; Andrade RJ;
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 May; 27(9):780-9. PubMed ID: 18284654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causality assessment of herb-induced liver injury using multidisciplinary approach and Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM).
    Nin Chau T; Cheung WI; Ngan T; Lin J; Lee KW; Tat Poon W; Leung VK; Mak T; Tse ML;
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2011 Jan; 49(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21114414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RUCAM in Drug and Herb Induced Liver Injury: The Update.
    Danan G; Teschke R
    Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 26712744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-ranking drugs out of 3312 drug-induced liver injury cases evaluated by the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method.
    Teschke R
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):1169-1187. PubMed ID: 30354694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adverse drug reactions: physicians' opinions versus a causality assessment method.
    Miremont G; Haramburu F; Bégaud B; Péré JC; Dangoumau J
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1994; 46(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 7957509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can decisional algorithms replace global introspection in the individual causality assessment of spontaneously reported ADRs?
    Macedo AF; Marques FB; Ribeiro CF
    Drug Saf; 2006; 29(8):697-702. PubMed ID: 16872243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An automated causality assessment algorithm to detect drug-induced liver injury in electronic medical record data.
    Cheetham TC; Lee J; Hunt CM; Niu F; Reisinger S; Murray R; Powell G; Papay J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Jun; 23(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 24920207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases.
    Teschke R; Zhu Y; Jing J
    J Clin Transl Hepatol; 2020 Jun; 8(2):200-214. PubMed ID: 32832401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causality assessment for suspected DILI during clinical phases of drug development.
    Regev A; Seeff LB; Merz M; Ormarsdottir S; Aithal GP; Gallivan J; Watkins PB
    Drug Saf; 2014 Nov; 37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S47-56. PubMed ID: 25352327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consistency between causality assessments obtained with two scales and their agreement with clinical judgments in hepatotoxicity.
    Miljkovic MM; Dobric S; Dragojevic-Simic V
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Mar; 20(3):272-85. PubMed ID: 21351309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of drug-induced liver injury in clinical practice.
    Lucena MI; García-Cortés M; Cueto R; Lopez-Duran J; Andrade RJ
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 18353109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.