These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8229880)

  • 1. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions.
    Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Oct; 70(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 8229880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
    Hansen EK
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 100(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 1439532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
    Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17073206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions.
    van Dijken JW
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15241906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities.
    Rahiotis C; Tzoutzas J; Kakaboura A
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15119587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions.
    Vanherle G; Lambrechts P; Braem M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 1829111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 May; 140(5):526-35. PubMed ID: 19411519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slow progression of dentin bond degradation during one-year water storage under simulated pulpal pressure.
    Belli R; Sartori N; Peruchi LD; Guimarães JC; Araújo E; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Lohbauer U
    J Dent; 2010 Oct; 38(10):802-10. PubMed ID: 20599465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
    Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems.
    Tyas MJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8054189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.