These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8229880)

  • 21. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions.
    Van Meerbeek B; Peumans M; Gladys S; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):775-84. PubMed ID: 9161271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years.
    Swift EJ; Perdigão J; Wilder AD; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1117-23. PubMed ID: 11575019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):277-82. PubMed ID: 10850246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 2202813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of a filled adhesive system in Class 5 restorations.
    Boghosian A
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1996 Aug; 17(8):750-2, 754-7. PubMed ID: 9051950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Oct; 41(5):324-7. PubMed ID: 8961606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive.
    Swift EJ; Perdigão J; Heymann HO; Wilder AD; Bayne SC; May KN; Sturdevant JR; Roberson TM
    J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11137632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term nanoleakage depth and pattern of cervical restorations bonded with different adhesives.
    Mobarak EH; Daifalla LE
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 21942238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A 3-year evaluation of Gluma and Gluma/Scotchbond for restoration of cervical erosions.
    van Dijken JW
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug; 98(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 2119052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2.
    Barkmeier WW; Los SA; Triolo PT
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 8695004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine.
    Itota T; Nakabo S; Narukami T; Tashiro Y; Torii Y; McCabe JF; Yoshiyama M
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 15683896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of bond strength and internal adaptation between the dental cavity and adhesives applied in one and two layers.
    Soares CG; Carracho HG; Braun AP; Borges GA; Hirakata LM; Spohr AM
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 20166413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled Etch-and-Rinse and a Self-Etch Adhesive System Containing MDPB and Fluoride in Non-carious Cervical Lesions.
    de Oliveira FG; Machado LS; Sundfeld-Neto D; Giannini M; Briso AL; Dos Santos PH; Sundefeld ML; Sundfeld RH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Mar; 38(3):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 28257217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.