BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8230550)

  • 1. Long-term effects of ureteric stent after ureteric dilation.
    Selmy GI; Hassouna MM; Bégin LR; Khalaf IM; Elhilali MM
    J Urol; 1993 Dec; 150(6):1984-9. PubMed ID: 8230550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of balloon dilation of ureter on upper tract dynamics and ureteral wall morphology.
    Selmy G; Hassouna M; Bégin LR; Coolsaet BL; Elhilali M
    J Endourol; 1993 Jun; 7(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 8358417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent.
    Lumiaho J; Heino A; Aaltomaa S; Välimaa T; Talja M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 21222571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of balloon dilatation on canine ureteric physiology.
    Lennon GM; Fitzpatrick JM
    Eur Urol; 1994; 25(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 8200409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model.
    Krebs A; Deane LA; Borin JF; Edwards RA; Sala LG; Khan F; Abdelshehid C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19154469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New bioabsorbable polylactide ureteral stent in the treatment of ureteral lesions: an experimental study.
    Lumiaho J; Heino A; Tunninen V; Ala-Opas M; Talja M; Välimaa T; Törmälä P
    J Endourol; 1999 Mar; 13(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10213104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: an experimental study.
    Schwalb DM; Eshghi M; Davidian M; Franco I
    J Urol; 1993 Jun; 149(6):1576-85. PubMed ID: 8501816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamics of the urinary tract in longterm vesico-ureteric reflux in pigs. III.
    Jörgensen TM
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1985; 19(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 4070988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double pigtail ureteric stent versus percutaneous nephrostomy: effects on stone transit and ureteric motility.
    Lennon GM; Thornhill JA; Grainger R; McDermott TE; Butler MR
    Eur Urol; 1997; 31(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9032530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the flow dynamics in the obstructed and stented ureter by means of a biomimetic artificial model.
    Clavica F; Zhao X; ElMahdy M; Drake MJ; Zhang X; Carugo D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87433. PubMed ID: 24498322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flow dynamics in a stented ureter.
    Siggers JH; Waters S; Wattis J; Cummings L
    Math Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 26(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 18990681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamics of the ureterovesical junction: its fluid transport mechanism in the pig.
    Blok C; Van Venrooij GE; Mokhless I; Coolsaet BL
    J Urol; 1985 Jul; 134(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 4009818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ureterovesical junction inhibitory reflex and vesicoureteral junction excitatory reflex: description of two reflexes and their role in the ureteric antireflux mechanism.
    Shafik A
    Urol Res; 1996; 24(6):339-43. PubMed ID: 9008326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of internal ureteral stenting of normal ureter on the upper urinary tract: an experimental study.
    el-Deen ME; Khalaf I; Rahim FA
    J Endourol; 1993 Oct; 7(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 8298623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of ureteral strictures by different modalities and effect of stents on upper tract drainage.
    Galal H; Lazica A; Lampel A; el Guiochi F; Schubert GE; Thüroff J; Khalaf I
    J Endourol; 1993 Oct; 7(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 8298624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on various double-J stents in vivo and in vitro.
    Cormio L; Vuopio-Varkila J; Siitonen A; Talja M; Ruutu M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1996 Feb; 30(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 8727860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a new polytetrafluoroethylene-covered metallic stent to a noncovered stent in canine ureters.
    Chung HH; Lee SH; Cho SB; Park HS; Kim YS; Kang BC; Frisoli JK; Razavi MK
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):619-28. PubMed ID: 18214599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact on ureteral peristalsis in a stented ureter. An experimental study in the pig.
    Kinn AC; Lykkeskov-Andersen H
    Urol Res; 2002 Sep; 30(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 12202937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of double J stenting on unobstructed ureters. An experimental and clinical study.
    Ramsay JW; Payne SR; Gosling PT; Whitfield HN; Wickham JE; Levison DA
    Br J Urol; 1985 Dec; 57(6):630-4. PubMed ID: 4084720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ureteric profilometry. A study of the ureteric pressure profile in the normal and pathologic ureter.
    Shafik A
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1998 Feb; 32(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 9561568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.