1223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8230621)
1. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8667536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Carney PA; Geller B; Mandelson MT; Taplin SH; Malvin K; Ernster V; Urban N; Cutter G; Rosenberg R; Ballard-Barbash R
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Dec; 133(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 11103055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8667537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.
Brown ML; Houn F; Sickles EA; Kessler LG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1373-7. PubMed ID: 7484568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Annual screening mammography for breast cancer in women 75 years old or older: to screen or not to screen.
Hartman M; Drotman M; Arleo EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1132-6. PubMed ID: 25905953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Barclay J; Grady D; Sickles EA; Ernster V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jan; 89(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 8978410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.
Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Mæhlen J
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1118-24. PubMed ID: 21996169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).
Eheman CR; Benard VB; Blackman D; Lawson HW; Anderson C; Helsel W; Lee NC
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Feb; 17(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16411050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Stomper PC; Gelman RS
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial.
Nixon RM; Pharoah P; Tabar L; Krusemo UB; Duffy SW; Prevost TC; Chen HH
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 11011299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opportunistic breast cancer screening in Hong Kong; a revisit of the Kwong Wah Hospital experience.
Lui CY; Lam HS; Chan LK; Tam KF; Chan CM; Leung TY; Mak KL
Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Apr; 13(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 17406037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
