These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8230621)

  • 1. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8667536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8667537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.
    Brown ML; Houn F; Sickles EA; Kessler LG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1373-7. PubMed ID: 7484568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Carney PA; Geller B; Mandelson MT; Taplin SH; Malvin K; Ernster V; Urban N; Cutter G; Rosenberg R; Ballard-Barbash R
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Dec; 133(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 11103055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Annual screening mammography for breast cancer in women 75 years old or older: to screen or not to screen.
    Hartman M; Drotman M; Arleo EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1132-6. PubMed ID: 25905953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
    Nowicki A; Stogowska I
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Barclay J; Grady D; Sickles EA; Ernster V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jan; 89(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 8978410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.
    Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Mæhlen J
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1118-24. PubMed ID: 21996169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
    Thurfjell E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).
    Eheman CR; Benard VB; Blackman D; Lawson HW; Anderson C; Helsel W; Lee NC
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Feb; 17(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16411050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial.
    Nixon RM; Pharoah P; Tabar L; Krusemo UB; Duffy SW; Prevost TC; Chen HH
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 11011299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opportunistic breast cancer screening in Hong Kong; a revisit of the Kwong Wah Hospital experience.
    Lui CY; Lam HS; Chan LK; Tam KF; Chan CM; Leung TY; Mak KL
    Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Apr; 13(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 17406037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.